PurposeIVIM-DW imaging has shown potential usefulness in the study of pancreatic lesions. Controversial results are available regarding the reliability of the measurements of IVIM-derived parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and the diagnostic potential of IVIM-derived parameters in differentiation among focal solid pancreatic lesions and normal pancreas (NP).MethodsFifty-seven patients (34 carcinomasPDACs, 18 neuroendocrine neoplasmspanNENs, and 5 autoimmune pancreatitisAIP) and 50subjects with NP underwent 1.5-T MR imaging including IVIM-DWI. Images were analyzed by two independent readers. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), slow component of diffusion (D), incoherent microcirculation (Dp), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated. Interobserver reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Kruskal-Wallis H test with Steel-Dwass post hoc test was used for comparison. The diagnostic performance of each parameter was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsOverall interobserver agreement was excellent (ICC=0.860, 0.937, 0.968, and 0.983 for ADC, D, Dp, and f). D, Dp, and f significantly differed among PDACs and panNENs (p=0.002,<0.001, and<0.001), albeit without significant difference at the pairwise comparison of ROC curves (p=0.08-0.74). Perfusion fraction was higher in AIP compared with PDACs (p=0.024; AUC=0.735). Dp and f were higher in panNENs compared with AIP (p=0.029 and 0.023), without differences at ROC analysis (p=0.07).ConclusionsIVIM-derived parameters have excellent reliability and could help in differentiation among solid pancreatic lesions and NP.

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid pancreatic masses: reliability and usefulness for characterization

De Robertis, Riccardo
;
Cardobi, Nicolò;Ortolani, Silvia;Gobbo, Stefano;Butturini, Giovanni;D'Onofrio, Mirko
2019-01-01

Abstract

PurposeIVIM-DW imaging has shown potential usefulness in the study of pancreatic lesions. Controversial results are available regarding the reliability of the measurements of IVIM-derived parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and the diagnostic potential of IVIM-derived parameters in differentiation among focal solid pancreatic lesions and normal pancreas (NP).MethodsFifty-seven patients (34 carcinomasPDACs, 18 neuroendocrine neoplasmspanNENs, and 5 autoimmune pancreatitisAIP) and 50subjects with NP underwent 1.5-T MR imaging including IVIM-DWI. Images were analyzed by two independent readers. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), slow component of diffusion (D), incoherent microcirculation (Dp), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated. Interobserver reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Kruskal-Wallis H test with Steel-Dwass post hoc test was used for comparison. The diagnostic performance of each parameter was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsOverall interobserver agreement was excellent (ICC=0.860, 0.937, 0.968, and 0.983 for ADC, D, Dp, and f). D, Dp, and f significantly differed among PDACs and panNENs (p=0.002,<0.001, and<0.001), albeit without significant difference at the pairwise comparison of ROC curves (p=0.08-0.74). Perfusion fraction was higher in AIP compared with PDACs (p=0.024; AUC=0.735). Dp and f were higher in panNENs compared with AIP (p=0.029 and 0.023), without differences at ROC analysis (p=0.07).ConclusionsIVIM-derived parameters have excellent reliability and could help in differentiation among solid pancreatic lesions and NP.
Diffusion-weighted imaging; Intravoxel incoherent motion; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pancreas; Pancreatic carcinoma
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/983198
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact