As procedural systems of some Member States allow the claimant to obtain default judgments without examination of the merits (and, therefore, without reasoning) against non-appearing defendants, the principle of mutual recognition may entail a breach of Article 6 ECHR. In Avotins c. Latvia, the Strasbourg Court tackles with the issue in the light of the so-called Bosphorus presumption, which informs the relationship between the EU legal order and the ECHR.
Principio della protezione equivalente fra UE e CEDU e mutuo riconoscimento delle decisioni tra Stati membri: la sentenza della Corte EDU nel caso Avotins c. Lettonia
CIAMPI, Annalisa;STELLA, Marcello
2017-01-01
Abstract
As procedural systems of some Member States allow the claimant to obtain default judgments without examination of the merits (and, therefore, without reasoning) against non-appearing defendants, the principle of mutual recognition may entail a breach of Article 6 ECHR. In Avotins c. Latvia, the Strasbourg Court tackles with the issue in the light of the so-called Bosphorus presumption, which informs the relationship between the EU legal order and the ECHR.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
OSF_2_2017 Ciampi-Stella.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
228.48 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
228.48 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.