In this paper, we introduce the synthesis problem for Halpern and Shoham’s interval temporal logic [5] extended with an equivalence relation ∼ over time points (HS ∼ for short). In analogy to the case of monadic second-order logic of one successor [2], given an HS ∼ formula φ and a finite set ΣT ofpropositionlettersandtemporalrequests,theproblemconsistsofestablishingwhetherornot, forallpossibleevaluationsofelementsinΣT ineveryintervalstructure,thereisanevaluationofthe remaining proposition letters and temporal requests such that the resulting structure is a model for φ. We focus our attention on the decidability of the synthesis problem for some meaningful fragments of HS ∼, whose modalities are drawn from {A (meets), A ̄ (met by), B (begun by), B ̄ (begins)}, interpreted over finite linear orders and natural numbers. We prove that the synthesis problem for ABB ∼ over finite linear orders is decidable (non-primitive recursive hard), while AA ̄BB ̄ turns out to be undecidable. In addition, we show that if we replace finite linear orders by natural numbers, then the problem becomes undecidable even for ABB ̄.

Interval-based Synthesis

SALA, Pietro
2014-01-01

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the synthesis problem for Halpern and Shoham’s interval temporal logic [5] extended with an equivalence relation ∼ over time points (HS ∼ for short). In analogy to the case of monadic second-order logic of one successor [2], given an HS ∼ formula φ and a finite set ΣT ofpropositionlettersandtemporalrequests,theproblemconsistsofestablishingwhetherornot, forallpossibleevaluationsofelementsinΣT ineveryintervalstructure,thereisanevaluationofthe remaining proposition letters and temporal requests such that the resulting structure is a model for φ. We focus our attention on the decidability of the synthesis problem for some meaningful fragments of HS ∼, whose modalities are drawn from {A (meets), A ̄ (met by), B (begun by), B ̄ (begins)}, interpreted over finite linear orders and natural numbers. We prove that the synthesis problem for ABB ∼ over finite linear orders is decidable (non-primitive recursive hard), while AA ̄BB ̄ turns out to be undecidable. In addition, we show that if we replace finite linear orders by natural numbers, then the problem becomes undecidable even for ABB ̄.
2014
Interval Temporal Logic, Church Problem, Synthesis
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1408.5960v1 (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 288.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
288.18 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/932513
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact