OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis of an improved myocardial and cerebral protection by combining blood cardioplegia and the single aortic cross-clamp technique, 100 patients were enrolled in a prospectively randomized study and stratified for preoperative conditions. METHODS: In Group I, 55 patients underwent myocardial revascularization using crystalloid cardioplegia and the conventional partial occluding clamp technique to perform proximal anastomoses, whereas in Group II, 45 patients were operated on combining blood cardioplegia and the single aortic cross-clamp technique. Unstable angina, emergency procedures, reoperations and preoperative counterpulsation accounted for an higher risk score in group II patients (P < 0.03). Operations were performed by the same surgical team. Aortic cross-clamp time was significantly longer in group II patients (59 +/- 22 vs. 47 +/- 18 min.) (P < 0.001). Other intraoperative variables were not significant. RESULTS: A 70-year-old male in group I died on post-operative day 5 as a consequence of a major neurological event. Length of ventilatory dependency, post-operative bleeding, need for blood transfusions, ICU stay, and hospital stay were similar between the two groups (P = NS). Patients in group I showed a strict correlation between the duration of surgical ischemia and post-operative myocardial necrosis. Analysis of combined mortality and morbidity events (adverse events) between the two groups, led to a significant prevalence in group I patients (P < 0.03) in spite of an higher pre-operative risk score and longer ischemic times in group II patients. Neurological lesions remained confined to group I patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of blood cardioplegia, delivered via the antegrade and retrograde routes, and the single-clamp technique to perform myocardial revascularization, might enhance myocardial and cerebral protection when compared to conventional methods. Larger groups of patients are needed to support this trend.
Single aortic cross-clamp technique in coronary surgery: a prospective randomized study
SANTINI, Francesco;MAZZUCCO, Alessandro
1997-01-01
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis of an improved myocardial and cerebral protection by combining blood cardioplegia and the single aortic cross-clamp technique, 100 patients were enrolled in a prospectively randomized study and stratified for preoperative conditions. METHODS: In Group I, 55 patients underwent myocardial revascularization using crystalloid cardioplegia and the conventional partial occluding clamp technique to perform proximal anastomoses, whereas in Group II, 45 patients were operated on combining blood cardioplegia and the single aortic cross-clamp technique. Unstable angina, emergency procedures, reoperations and preoperative counterpulsation accounted for an higher risk score in group II patients (P < 0.03). Operations were performed by the same surgical team. Aortic cross-clamp time was significantly longer in group II patients (59 +/- 22 vs. 47 +/- 18 min.) (P < 0.001). Other intraoperative variables were not significant. RESULTS: A 70-year-old male in group I died on post-operative day 5 as a consequence of a major neurological event. Length of ventilatory dependency, post-operative bleeding, need for blood transfusions, ICU stay, and hospital stay were similar between the two groups (P = NS). Patients in group I showed a strict correlation between the duration of surgical ischemia and post-operative myocardial necrosis. Analysis of combined mortality and morbidity events (adverse events) between the two groups, led to a significant prevalence in group I patients (P < 0.03) in spite of an higher pre-operative risk score and longer ischemic times in group II patients. Neurological lesions remained confined to group I patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of blood cardioplegia, delivered via the antegrade and retrograde routes, and the single-clamp technique to perform myocardial revascularization, might enhance myocardial and cerebral protection when compared to conventional methods. Larger groups of patients are needed to support this trend.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
