An in vivo study of quantum dots tissue accumulation

Nanotechnology represents a new frontier for the science progress and there are great expectations in relation to diagnostic and therapeutic envelopes [1]. Living organisms are built of cells that are typically 10 μm across. However, the cell parts are much smaller and are in the sub-micron size domain, for example a red blood cell is approximately 7,000 nm wide. Even smaller are the proteins with a typical size of just 5 nm, which is comparable with the dimensions of smallest manmade nanoparticles. This simple size comparison gives an idea of using nanoparticles as very small probes that would allow us to spy at the cellular machinery without introducing too much interference. Understanding of biological processes on the nanoscale level is a strong driving force behind development of nanotechnologyOur current knowledge of the toxicology of nanoparticles in vivo is poor [2] but suggests that nanoparticles may able to have adverse effects at their portal of entry , for example, the lungs, but that some nanoparticles may also escape the normal defences and translocate from their portal of entry to have diverse effects in other target organs [3].There is no cut-off below witch particles suddenly become harmful, in the lung at least. This is because harmful particles have their effects as a consequence of two factors that act together to determine their potential to cause harm: their large surface area, and the reactivity or intrinsic toxicity of the surface. It is self evident that the smaller particles are, the more surface area they have per unit mass; therefore any intrinsic toxicity of the particles surface will be emphasised. Some of the most complex nanoparticles are likely to be produced for therapeutic purposes, furthermore nanoparticles binding to protein may result in a series of consequences not expected to occur when proteins bind to large particles. Very small particles may be not detected by the normal phagocytic defences, allowing them to gain access to the blood or nervous system [4]. Very small particles are smaller than some molecules and could act like haptens to modify protein structures, either altering their function or rendering them antigenic, raising the potential for autoimmune effects.Tracers that we have used are nanoparticles with optical properties, fluorescent semiconductors, that absorb photons of light and re-emit photons at a different wavelength They are known as quantum dots (QDs), nanocrystals that are nanometres-scale (10-20nm, roughly protein-sized) atom clusters, containing from a few hundred to a few thousand atoms of a semiconductor material (cadmium mixed with selenium), which has been coated with an additional semiconductor shell (zinc sulfide) to improve the optical properties of the material. These nanoparticles fluoresce in a different way than do traditional fluorophores, they exhibit some important differences as compared to organic fluorescent dyes and naturally fluorescent proteins: they have an extinction coefficient 10-50 times bigger than them. These nanoparticles projected around their optical properties: stable , bright and photo-stable fluorescence, observed and measured for hours, and that persists also into isolated tissues. Nanoparticles like QDs, could be targeted and not targeted and provided several unique features and capabilities[5, 6]: the size-effect does the QDs cancer biomarkers and there is the possibility to functionalize their surface area with a several numbers of functional groups that can be linked with multiple diagnostic (e.g. radio-isotopic or magnetic) and therapeutic agents. The aim of the study is to monitor nanoparticles behaviour into blood system: kinetic, T1/2, bio distribution, and tissues accumulation. We would extrapolate from optics parameters physiological ones, in specific districts so as liver and lungs that are the most probably targets of toxicity.