Technological advances, particularly in e-health and telemedicine, have significantly influenced the evolution of healthcare services, especially after COVID-19. Telemedicine, defined as “the delivery of health services where distance is a critical factor”, is gaining popularity by extending the available services from urban centers to rural areas, and technology acceptance frameworks have been widely used to assess the telemedicine acceptance level. However, the heterogeneity of assessments leads to fragmentation, which limits methodological rigor and generalizable results. The current systematic review aims to answer three questions: (1) How is “acceptance” defined and measured in telemedicine? (2) What methods are most used to assess the acceptability of telemedicine delivered in rural areas? (3) To what extent do rural health care practitioners and patients accept telemedicine?. The review incorporated a final sample of 104 studies published between 2018 and 2024 that show a balance between quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the number of studies referencing a theoretical framework when evaluating acceptance (29%) and using standardized research tools (37%). The combination of these results with the fact that most authors (68%) claimed to have measured high levels of acceptance calls for a critical look into the literature and the generalizability of published results.

Telemedicine Acceptance in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review of Definitions, Methods, and Measurement Practices

Marco Lezcano;Maria Gabriella Landuzzi
;
Margherita Pasini;Luca Laezza;Martina Vacondio
2026-01-01

Abstract

Technological advances, particularly in e-health and telemedicine, have significantly influenced the evolution of healthcare services, especially after COVID-19. Telemedicine, defined as “the delivery of health services where distance is a critical factor”, is gaining popularity by extending the available services from urban centers to rural areas, and technology acceptance frameworks have been widely used to assess the telemedicine acceptance level. However, the heterogeneity of assessments leads to fragmentation, which limits methodological rigor and generalizable results. The current systematic review aims to answer three questions: (1) How is “acceptance” defined and measured in telemedicine? (2) What methods are most used to assess the acceptability of telemedicine delivered in rural areas? (3) To what extent do rural health care practitioners and patients accept telemedicine?. The review incorporated a final sample of 104 studies published between 2018 and 2024 that show a balance between quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the number of studies referencing a theoretical framework when evaluating acceptance (29%) and using standardized research tools (37%). The combination of these results with the fact that most authors (68%) claimed to have measured high levels of acceptance calls for a critical look into the literature and the generalizability of published results.
2026
Telemedicine, Rural areas, Systematic review, Technology acceptance, Methodology
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Published paper - Lezcano et al - Telemedicine Acceptance in Rural Settings A Systematic Review of Definitions Methods and Measurement Practices.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.12 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.12 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1200788
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact