This study investigates the influence of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) systems on the phenomenon of environmental decoupling, defined as the misalignment between firms’ environmental disclosure and actual performance. Drawing on agency and stakeholder theory, we examine whether board oversight of climate risks, crisis management systems, and an-ti‑corruption procedures reduce the disclosure–performance gap. Using a panel of 924 Europe-an companies across 20 countries and 18 industries (2015–2024), we find that board oversight and crisis management systems are positively associated with environmental decoupling, suggesting symbolic rather than substantive governance. In contrast, anti‑corruption procedures significantly mitigate decoupling, highlighting the importance of binding and enforceable governance mechanisms. The findings contribute to the debate on the credibility of sustainabil-ity reporting and offer implications for scholars, practitioners, and regulators seeking to strengthen the alignment between communication and operational realities.

The effect of GRC Systems on Environmental Decoupling

Florio C.
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) systems on the phenomenon of environmental decoupling, defined as the misalignment between firms’ environmental disclosure and actual performance. Drawing on agency and stakeholder theory, we examine whether board oversight of climate risks, crisis management systems, and an-ti‑corruption procedures reduce the disclosure–performance gap. Using a panel of 924 Europe-an companies across 20 countries and 18 industries (2015–2024), we find that board oversight and crisis management systems are positively associated with environmental decoupling, suggesting symbolic rather than substantive governance. In contrast, anti‑corruption procedures significantly mitigate decoupling, highlighting the importance of binding and enforceable governance mechanisms. The findings contribute to the debate on the credibility of sustainabil-ity reporting and offer implications for scholars, practitioners, and regulators seeking to strengthen the alignment between communication and operational realities.
2025
Environmental decoupling, Disclosure–performance gap, Governance, Risk management, Compliance, Board risk oversight, Climate change risk, Crisis management, Corruption, Agency theory, Stakeholder theory
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
HTW_2177_2181_11ERRNProceedings.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.15 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1178749
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact