OBJECTIVE To explore the safety and feasibility of the Da Vinci single-port (SP) platform in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP), aiming to provide a viable option for patients with surgical and medical complexities that might otherwise limit their access to common minimally invasive technique. METHODS Data from 60 medically and surgically highly complex patients undergoing SP-RARP between December 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed. Variables included patient characteristics, surgical history, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 17.0. RESULTS Fifty-three percent of cases had a hostile abdomen (HA) (>= 1 major abdominal surgery), and 47% were medically highly complex (American Society of Anesthesiologists score >= 3, Charlson Comorbidity Index >= 5, and a body mass index >= 30). The extraperitoneal approach was used in 56% of HA cases and 68% of MHC cases. Intraoperative complications occurred in 12%, exclusively with the transperitoneal approach in HA cases. Postoperative complications (ClavienDindo >= 3) were 6% and 14%, respectively, with no significant difference between approaches. Same-day discharge was possible in 44% of HA cases and 54% of MHC cases, with significant statistical differences favoring the extraperitoneal approach in both groups. CONCLUSION SP-RARP, particularly the extraperitoneal approach, is a viable option for highly complex and challenging cases, providing acceptable oncological and functional outcomes. Prospective studies are crucial for further validating the safety and feasibility of SP-RARP in this patient population. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Single Port Radical Prostatectomy as a Viable Option for Highly Complex Patients: A Single Center Experience
Pettenuzzo, Greta;Ditonno, Francesco;Antonelli, Alessandro;
2024-01-01
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the safety and feasibility of the Da Vinci single-port (SP) platform in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP), aiming to provide a viable option for patients with surgical and medical complexities that might otherwise limit their access to common minimally invasive technique. METHODS Data from 60 medically and surgically highly complex patients undergoing SP-RARP between December 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed. Variables included patient characteristics, surgical history, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 17.0. RESULTS Fifty-three percent of cases had a hostile abdomen (HA) (>= 1 major abdominal surgery), and 47% were medically highly complex (American Society of Anesthesiologists score >= 3, Charlson Comorbidity Index >= 5, and a body mass index >= 30). The extraperitoneal approach was used in 56% of HA cases and 68% of MHC cases. Intraoperative complications occurred in 12%, exclusively with the transperitoneal approach in HA cases. Postoperative complications (ClavienDindo >= 3) were 6% and 14%, respectively, with no significant difference between approaches. Same-day discharge was possible in 44% of HA cases and 54% of MHC cases, with significant statistical differences favoring the extraperitoneal approach in both groups. CONCLUSION SP-RARP, particularly the extraperitoneal approach, is a viable option for highly complex and challenging cases, providing acceptable oncological and functional outcomes. Prospective studies are crucial for further validating the safety and feasibility of SP-RARP in this patient population. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.