All means of dispute settlement between states, including adjudication, are based on the consent of the parties concerned. The post-Cold War era saw an unprecedented growth of third-party (judge or arbitrator) dispute resolution systems. In more recent years, however, we are witnessing a weakening of the international judicial function. This paper analyses and explains similarities and differences with dispute resolution between private parties at the national level – with a view to contributes. And it makes a contribution to the question of whether the de-judicialisation taking place in Italy and elsewhere as well as in the international legal system, can be considered a step in the right direction.

La giustizia consensuale internazionale

A Ciampi
2023-01-01

Abstract

All means of dispute settlement between states, including adjudication, are based on the consent of the parties concerned. The post-Cold War era saw an unprecedented growth of third-party (judge or arbitrator) dispute resolution systems. In more recent years, however, we are witnessing a weakening of the international judicial function. This paper analyses and explains similarities and differences with dispute resolution between private parties at the national level – with a view to contributes. And it makes a contribution to the question of whether the de-judicialisation taking place in Italy and elsewhere as well as in the international legal system, can be considered a step in the right direction.
2023
International Dispute Settlement; State sovereignty; Diplomacy
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1100507
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact