All means of dispute settlement between states, including adjudication, are based on the consent of the parties concerned. The post-Cold War era saw an unprecedented growth of third-party (judge or arbitrator) dispute resolution systems. In more recent years, however, we are witnessing a weakening of the international judicial function. This paper analyses and explains similarities and differences with dispute resolution between private parties at the national level – with a view to contributes. And it makes a contribution to the question of whether the de-judicialisation taking place in Italy and elsewhere as well as in the international legal system, can be considered a step in the right direction.
La giustizia consensuale internazionale
A Ciampi
2023-01-01
Abstract
All means of dispute settlement between states, including adjudication, are based on the consent of the parties concerned. The post-Cold War era saw an unprecedented growth of third-party (judge or arbitrator) dispute resolution systems. In more recent years, however, we are witnessing a weakening of the international judicial function. This paper analyses and explains similarities and differences with dispute resolution between private parties at the national level – with a view to contributes. And it makes a contribution to the question of whether the de-judicialisation taking place in Italy and elsewhere as well as in the international legal system, can be considered a step in the right direction.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.