Many studies have examined the diagnostic concordance of whole slide imaging (WSI) and light microscopy (LM) for surgical pathology. In cytopathology, WSI use has been more limited, mainly because of technical issues. The aim of this study was to review the literature and determine the overall diagnostic concordance of WSI and LM in cytopathology. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed, with data extracted from the included articles. A quality assessment of studies was performed with a modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The primary outcome was concordance for the diagnoses rendered by WSI and LM as shown by the concordance rate with the original diagnosis, intra-observer and interobserver concordance with the κ coefficient, or a percentage. Secondary outcomes included the time taken to reach a diagnosis and the quality and perception of WSI. A descriptive survey was provided. Among 1867 publications, a total of 19 studies (1%) were included. Overall, the concordance between WSI and the original diagnosis was 84.1%, the intra-observer concordance between WSI and LM was 92.5% with a κ coefficient of 0.66, and the interobserver κ coefficient was 0.69. The time to reach a diagnosis was longer with WSI in all studies. The quality of WSI was good, but diagnostic confidence and cytologist preference were higher for LM. In conclusion, the concordance of WSI with LM is acceptable and in line with systematic reviews in surgical pathology. However, the time required for scanning and technical issues represent barriers to complete adoption. It is foreseeable that technical advances and rigorous validation study design will help to improve the diagnostic concordance of WSI with LM in cytopathology.

Diagnostic concordance between whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in cytopathology: A systematic review

Girolami, Ilaria;Marletta, Stefano;Brunelli, Matteo;Parisi, Alice;Barresi, Valeria;Scarpa, Aldo;Eccher, Albino
2020

Abstract

Many studies have examined the diagnostic concordance of whole slide imaging (WSI) and light microscopy (LM) for surgical pathology. In cytopathology, WSI use has been more limited, mainly because of technical issues. The aim of this study was to review the literature and determine the overall diagnostic concordance of WSI and LM in cytopathology. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed, with data extracted from the included articles. A quality assessment of studies was performed with a modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The primary outcome was concordance for the diagnoses rendered by WSI and LM as shown by the concordance rate with the original diagnosis, intra-observer and interobserver concordance with the κ coefficient, or a percentage. Secondary outcomes included the time taken to reach a diagnosis and the quality and perception of WSI. A descriptive survey was provided. Among 1867 publications, a total of 19 studies (1%) were included. Overall, the concordance between WSI and the original diagnosis was 84.1%, the intra-observer concordance between WSI and LM was 92.5% with a κ coefficient of 0.66, and the interobserver κ coefficient was 0.69. The time to reach a diagnosis was longer with WSI in all studies. The quality of WSI was good, but diagnostic confidence and cytologist preference were higher for LM. In conclusion, the concordance of WSI with LM is acceptable and in line with systematic reviews in surgical pathology. However, the time required for scanning and technical issues represent barriers to complete adoption. It is foreseeable that technical advances and rigorous validation study design will help to improve the diagnostic concordance of WSI with LM in cytopathology.
agreement; cytology; cytopathology; diagnostic concordance; review; whole slide imaging
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1001743
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact