Background The use of alternative sample matrices may be an advantageous perspective when the laboratory falls short of serum or lithium-heparin plasma for performing clinical chemistry and/or immunochemistry testing. This study was aimed at exploring whether some tests may be performed in citrate plasma as an alternative to lithium-heparin plasma. Methods Paired lithium-heparin and citrate plasma samples collected from 55 inpatients were analyzed on Roche Cobas 8000 for 28 different clinical chemistry and immunochemistry parameters. Data obtained in citrate plasma were adjusted for either the dilution factor or using an equation corresponding to the linear regression calculated by comparing unadjusted lithium-heparin and citrate plasma values. Results Except for magnesium (+17%) and sodium (+11%), unadjusted values of all remaining analytes were significantly lower in citrate than in lithium-heparin plasma, with bias ranging between -6.4% and -25.9%. The correlation between lithium-heparin and citrate plasma values was generally excellent (i.e. >0.90). The adjustment of citrate plasma values for the dilution factor (i.e. 1.1) was only effective in harmonizing the results of albumin and lipase, whilst the concentration of all other analytes remained significantly different between the two sample matrices. The adjustment of plasma citrate values using corrective formulas was instead effective in harmonizing all parameters, with no results remaining statistically different between the two sample matrices. Conclusions Citrate plasma may be used in exceptional circumstances for clinical chemistry and immunochemistry testing as a replacement for lithium-heparin plasma, provided that citrate plasma values are adjusted by using validated corrective equations.

Can citrate plasma be used in exceptional circumstances for some clinical chemistry and immunochemistry tests?

Demonte, Davide;PUCCI, Mairi;Salvagno, Gian Luca;Lippi, Giuseppe
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background The use of alternative sample matrices may be an advantageous perspective when the laboratory falls short of serum or lithium-heparin plasma for performing clinical chemistry and/or immunochemistry testing. This study was aimed at exploring whether some tests may be performed in citrate plasma as an alternative to lithium-heparin plasma. Methods Paired lithium-heparin and citrate plasma samples collected from 55 inpatients were analyzed on Roche Cobas 8000 for 28 different clinical chemistry and immunochemistry parameters. Data obtained in citrate plasma were adjusted for either the dilution factor or using an equation corresponding to the linear regression calculated by comparing unadjusted lithium-heparin and citrate plasma values. Results Except for magnesium (+17%) and sodium (+11%), unadjusted values of all remaining analytes were significantly lower in citrate than in lithium-heparin plasma, with bias ranging between -6.4% and -25.9%. The correlation between lithium-heparin and citrate plasma values was generally excellent (i.e. >0.90). The adjustment of citrate plasma values for the dilution factor (i.e. 1.1) was only effective in harmonizing the results of albumin and lipase, whilst the concentration of all other analytes remained significantly different between the two sample matrices. The adjustment of plasma citrate values using corrective formulas was instead effective in harmonizing all parameters, with no results remaining statistically different between the two sample matrices. Conclusions Citrate plasma may be used in exceptional circumstances for clinical chemistry and immunochemistry testing as a replacement for lithium-heparin plasma, provided that citrate plasma values are adjusted by using validated corrective equations.
2019
citrate; clinical chemistry; lithium-heparin; preanalytical variability
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/994943
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact