The paper focuses on the interplay between public and private enforcement of EU competition law and aims at assessing the extent to which the Directive 2014/104 , so-called Damages Directive, jointly with Regulation 1/2003 , has improved the position of victims of competition infringements who intend to bring an action for damages before the national courts. In particular, the analysis is carried out in light of the Gasorba judgment rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter CJEU) on 23 November 2017 and, therefore, the focus is on the specific case of competition proceedings ending with a commitment decision.
Commitment decisions and private actions for damages in EU competition law in light of the Gasorba judgement: a new opening from the Court of Justice of the European Union?
FRATEA
2018-01-01
Abstract
The paper focuses on the interplay between public and private enforcement of EU competition law and aims at assessing the extent to which the Directive 2014/104 , so-called Damages Directive, jointly with Regulation 1/2003 , has improved the position of victims of competition infringements who intend to bring an action for damages before the national courts. In particular, the analysis is carried out in light of the Gasorba judgment rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter CJEU) on 23 November 2017 and, therefore, the focus is on the specific case of competition proceedings ending with a commitment decision.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
