Meningiomas represent the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in adulthood. They are currently classified into several histotypes and into three grades of malignancy according to the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the CNS. WHO histological grade is currently the most significant morphological predictor of recurrence risk of meningiomas. For this reason, it is fully taken into consideration in postsurgical therapeutic decision making in patients with meningioma. However, the main drawback of the WHO grading system system is that criteria for its assessment are rather subjective and poorly standardized. Hence, additional factors are warranted to predict recurrence risk of meningiomas, so that patients may actually receive the most appropriate therapy. In recent years, biomolecular pathogenesis of meningiomas has been partially clarified, and many efforts have been made in the identification of molecular factors associated with recurrence risk of meningioma. Here we review WHO criteria currently used for classification of meningiomas and discuss on pitfalls and limits of grading assessment. In addition we present the latest advancement in the knowledge of biomolecular alterations involved in the pathogenesis and progression of meningiomas. Similarly to what has already happened for gliomas, a novel classification integrating histology and molecular information might overcome the limits of histological classification in terms of reproducibility as well as of prognostic and predictive relevance. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Classification of human meningiomas: lights, shadows, and future perspectives

Barresi, Valeria;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Meningiomas represent the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in adulthood. They are currently classified into several histotypes and into three grades of malignancy according to the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the CNS. WHO histological grade is currently the most significant morphological predictor of recurrence risk of meningiomas. For this reason, it is fully taken into consideration in postsurgical therapeutic decision making in patients with meningioma. However, the main drawback of the WHO grading system system is that criteria for its assessment are rather subjective and poorly standardized. Hence, additional factors are warranted to predict recurrence risk of meningiomas, so that patients may actually receive the most appropriate therapy. In recent years, biomolecular pathogenesis of meningiomas has been partially clarified, and many efforts have been made in the identification of molecular factors associated with recurrence risk of meningioma. Here we review WHO criteria currently used for classification of meningiomas and discuss on pitfalls and limits of grading assessment. In addition we present the latest advancement in the knowledge of biomolecular alterations involved in the pathogenesis and progression of meningiomas. Similarly to what has already happened for gliomas, a novel classification integrating histology and molecular information might overcome the limits of histological classification in terms of reproducibility as well as of prognostic and predictive relevance. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2016
classification; grade; meningioma; prognosis; recurrence; reproducibility; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Humans; Meningioma; Neoplasm Grading; Prognosis; Reproducibility of Results
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/987828
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact