In this note we survey and compare the monotonicity formulas recently discovered by the authors in [1] and [2] in the context of classical potential theory and in the study of static metrics, respectively. In both cases we discuss the most significant implications of the monotonicity formulas in terms of sharp analytic and geometric inequalities. In particular, we derive the classical Willmore inequality for smooth compact hypersurfaces embedded in Euclidean space and the Riemannian Penrose inequality for static Black Holes with connected horizon.

Comparing monotonicity formulas for electrostatic potentials and static metrics

Agostiniani, Virginia;
2017-01-01

Abstract

In this note we survey and compare the monotonicity formulas recently discovered by the authors in [1] and [2] in the context of classical potential theory and in the study of static metrics, respectively. In both cases we discuss the most significant implications of the monotonicity formulas in terms of sharp analytic and geometric inequalities. In particular, we derive the classical Willmore inequality for smooth compact hypersurfaces embedded in Euclidean space and the Riemannian Penrose inequality for static Black Holes with connected horizon.
2017
elliptic boundary value problems
electrostatic capacity
static metrics
Willmore inequality
Riemannian Penrose inequality
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
comparing_monotonicity_formulas_rev_10_7_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 293.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
293.45 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/980740
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact