It is not possible to write the history of blasphemy, anticlericalism and religious scepticism in the Early Modern period without taking into consideration the variety of their di erent manifestations (not only words but also gestures), as well as the exibility of the boundary separating blasphemy as an emotional outburst from blasphemy as a conscious act of rebellion against the Church as an institution and God as an idea. The author investigates these issues by looking at materials of the Republic of Venice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. He tries to answer three overlapping questions: how the Inquisition and secular courts coordinated their activities in response to this broad eld of jurisdiction; how di erent forms of blasphemous sayings and actions correlated with religious scepticism and the theoretical elaboration of unbelief; and how in society, where disrespectful words and gestures toward sacred persons and objects were part of everyday life, the Church tried on the one hand to eradicate blasphemy, and on the other hand to reconcile itself with blasphemy’s ingrained existence.

Как принять неприемлемое. Богохульство и атеизм в судебной практике римской инквизиции в XVII веке // How to Accept the Unacceptable: Blasphemy and Atheism in the Judicial Practice of the Roman Inquisition in the Seventeenth Century

Barbierato, Federico
2017-01-01

Abstract

It is not possible to write the history of blasphemy, anticlericalism and religious scepticism in the Early Modern period without taking into consideration the variety of their di erent manifestations (not only words but also gestures), as well as the exibility of the boundary separating blasphemy as an emotional outburst from blasphemy as a conscious act of rebellion against the Church as an institution and God as an idea. The author investigates these issues by looking at materials of the Republic of Venice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. He tries to answer three overlapping questions: how the Inquisition and secular courts coordinated their activities in response to this broad eld of jurisdiction; how di erent forms of blasphemous sayings and actions correlated with religious scepticism and the theoretical elaboration of unbelief; and how in society, where disrespectful words and gestures toward sacred persons and objects were part of everyday life, the Church tried on the one hand to eradicate blasphemy, and on the other hand to reconcile itself with blasphemy’s ingrained existence.
2017
Italy
Ventian Inquisition
blasphemy
Canon law
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Barbierato 2017 2 Финал.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso ristretto
Dimensione 407.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
407.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/972406
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact