It is not possible to write the history of blasphemy, anticlericalism and religious scepticism in the Early Modern period without taking into consideration the variety of their di erent manifestations (not only words but also gestures), as well as the exibility of the boundary separating blasphemy as an emotional outburst from blasphemy as a conscious act of rebellion against the Church as an institution and God as an idea. The author investigates these issues by looking at materials of the Republic of Venice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. He tries to answer three overlapping questions: how the Inquisition and secular courts coordinated their activities in response to this broad eld of jurisdiction; how di erent forms of blasphemous sayings and actions correlated with religious scepticism and the theoretical elaboration of unbelief; and how in society, where disrespectful words and gestures toward sacred persons and objects were part of everyday life, the Church tried on the one hand to eradicate blasphemy, and on the other hand to reconcile itself with blasphemy’s ingrained existence.
Как принять неприемлемое. Богохульство и атеизм в судебной практике римской инквизиции в XVII веке // How to Accept the Unacceptable: Blasphemy and Atheism in the Judicial Practice of the Roman Inquisition in the Seventeenth Century
Barbierato, Federico
2017-01-01
Abstract
It is not possible to write the history of blasphemy, anticlericalism and religious scepticism in the Early Modern period without taking into consideration the variety of their di erent manifestations (not only words but also gestures), as well as the exibility of the boundary separating blasphemy as an emotional outburst from blasphemy as a conscious act of rebellion against the Church as an institution and God as an idea. The author investigates these issues by looking at materials of the Republic of Venice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. He tries to answer three overlapping questions: how the Inquisition and secular courts coordinated their activities in response to this broad eld of jurisdiction; how di erent forms of blasphemous sayings and actions correlated with religious scepticism and the theoretical elaboration of unbelief; and how in society, where disrespectful words and gestures toward sacred persons and objects were part of everyday life, the Church tried on the one hand to eradicate blasphemy, and on the other hand to reconcile itself with blasphemy’s ingrained existence.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Barbierato 2017 2 Финал.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso ristretto
Dimensione
407.22 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
407.22 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.