The new theoretical perspective proposed by the Open Theism compels us to a deepening and an evaluation of the “classic” solutions formulated to solve the antinomy between divine omniscience and human freedom. One of these “solutions” is the argumentation of Boethius, taken up and made more sophisticated by many authors in the contemporary debate in Analytic Philosophy of Religion. The Author aims to analyze the interpretation of the “timelessness solution” developed in this context and the main objections that have been addressed to it, attempting to outline some conclusions about its ef- ficacy in solving the antinomy and undermine the arguments of Open Theism

La soluzione di Boezio nel dibattito contemporaneo sull’onniscienza divina: un bilancio

MIGLIORINI, DAMIANO
2016-01-01

Abstract

The new theoretical perspective proposed by the Open Theism compels us to a deepening and an evaluation of the “classic” solutions formulated to solve the antinomy between divine omniscience and human freedom. One of these “solutions” is the argumentation of Boethius, taken up and made more sophisticated by many authors in the contemporary debate in Analytic Philosophy of Religion. The Author aims to analyze the interpretation of the “timelessness solution” developed in this context and the main objections that have been addressed to it, attempting to outline some conclusions about its ef- ficacy in solving the antinomy and undermine the arguments of Open Theism
2016
onniscienza
eternity
Boethius
timelessness
theism
philosophy of religion
divine attributes
open theism
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Migliorini_La soluzione di Boezio.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.89 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.89 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/967751
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact