A k-weak bisection of a cubic graph G is a partition of the vertex-set of G into two parts V 1 and V 2 of equal size, such that each connected component of the subgraph of G induced by V i (i = 1, 2) is a tree of at most k − 2 vertices. This notion can be viewed as a relaxed version of nowhere-zero flows, as it directly follows from old results of Jaeger that every cubic graph G with a circular nowhere-zero r-flow has a [r]-weak bisection. In this article, we study problems related to the existence of k-weak bisections. We believe that every cubic graph that has a perfect matching, other than the Petersen graph, admits a 4-weak bisection and we present a family of cubic graphs with no perfect matching that do not admit such a bisection. The main result of this article is that every cubic graph admits a 5-weak bisection. When restricted to bridgeless graphs, that result would be a consequence of the assertion of the 5-flow Conjecture and as such it can be considered a (very small) step toward proving that assertion. However, the harder part of our proof focuses on graphs that do contain bridges.
Flows and Bisections in Cubic Graphs
Mazzuoccolo, Giuseppe;
2017-01-01
Abstract
A k-weak bisection of a cubic graph G is a partition of the vertex-set of G into two parts V 1 and V 2 of equal size, such that each connected component of the subgraph of G induced by V i (i = 1, 2) is a tree of at most k − 2 vertices. This notion can be viewed as a relaxed version of nowhere-zero flows, as it directly follows from old results of Jaeger that every cubic graph G with a circular nowhere-zero r-flow has a [r]-weak bisection. In this article, we study problems related to the existence of k-weak bisections. We believe that every cubic graph that has a perfect matching, other than the Petersen graph, admits a 4-weak bisection and we present a family of cubic graphs with no perfect matching that do not admit such a bisection. The main result of this article is that every cubic graph admits a 5-weak bisection. When restricted to bridgeless graphs, that result would be a consequence of the assertion of the 5-flow Conjecture and as such it can be considered a (very small) step toward proving that assertion. However, the harder part of our proof focuses on graphs that do contain bridges.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
revision4.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Accesso ristretto
Dimensione
309.68 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
309.68 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.