The purpose of this work is to evaluate the potential dose reduction in computed tomography (CT) examinations using an iterative algorithm compared to a filtered backprojection (FBP) reconstruction, analyzing image quality parameters. A 256 slice CT scanner, equipped with software for both FBP and iterative reconstruction, and a CT dedicated phantom were used. The image quality was evaluated by analyzing five different parameters: CT number constancy, signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR), non-uniformity and axial spatial resolution (modulation transfer function, MTF). The CNR was evaluated on a low contrast insert and on a high contrast teflon insert, while the MTF was evaluated on a high density bead. The analysis was performed both on images obtained with FBP reconstruction and with the iterative algorithm (level 1 to 6). CT numbers were consistent between standard FBP and the iterative reconstruction. Non-uniformity and spatial resolution were not affected by the use of the iterative algorithm, and the SNR and the CNR were improved with the iterative algorithm, as a function of the level of iteration used. Comparing FBP to the sixth level of iteration, in a 120 kV scan performed at 200 mAs, a mean 43.6% noise reduction was observed and for the SNR and the CNR, a mean improvement of 70.9% and 70.6%, respectively, was obtained. A mean dose reduction of 36.5% was estimated using iterative reconstruction at level 3 without loss of image quality. The use of the iterative reconstruction method offers the possibility to improve image quality or to reduce patient dose in CT examinations, or a combination of these aspects. In our experience, reducing the tube current by 30% compared to the FBP scan and reconstructing the images by means of the iterative algorithm (level 3) resulted in equivalent image quality for both methods.
Dose reduction and image quality in CT examinations using an iterative reconstruction algorithm: a phantom study
Guariglia, Stefania;MELIADO', GABRIELE;ZIVELONGHI, Emanuele;PINALI, Lucia;MONTEMEZZI, STEFANIA;CAVEDON, CARLO
2015-01-01
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to evaluate the potential dose reduction in computed tomography (CT) examinations using an iterative algorithm compared to a filtered backprojection (FBP) reconstruction, analyzing image quality parameters. A 256 slice CT scanner, equipped with software for both FBP and iterative reconstruction, and a CT dedicated phantom were used. The image quality was evaluated by analyzing five different parameters: CT number constancy, signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR), non-uniformity and axial spatial resolution (modulation transfer function, MTF). The CNR was evaluated on a low contrast insert and on a high contrast teflon insert, while the MTF was evaluated on a high density bead. The analysis was performed both on images obtained with FBP reconstruction and with the iterative algorithm (level 1 to 6). CT numbers were consistent between standard FBP and the iterative reconstruction. Non-uniformity and spatial resolution were not affected by the use of the iterative algorithm, and the SNR and the CNR were improved with the iterative algorithm, as a function of the level of iteration used. Comparing FBP to the sixth level of iteration, in a 120 kV scan performed at 200 mAs, a mean 43.6% noise reduction was observed and for the SNR and the CNR, a mean improvement of 70.9% and 70.6%, respectively, was obtained. A mean dose reduction of 36.5% was estimated using iterative reconstruction at level 3 without loss of image quality. The use of the iterative reconstruction method offers the possibility to improve image quality or to reduce patient dose in CT examinations, or a combination of these aspects. In our experience, reducing the tube current by 30% compared to the FBP scan and reconstructing the images by means of the iterative algorithm (level 3) resulted in equivalent image quality for both methods.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.