Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with chronic kidney disease have shown suboptimal results. Drug-eluting stents (DES) might reduce the rate of target vessel revascularization in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, given the multiple concomitant individual variables present in such patients, the comparison of neointimal growth after percutaneous coronary intervention is complex and difficult to assess.

Randomized Comparison of Xience V and Multi-Link Vision Coronary Stents in the Same Multivessel Patient With Chronic Kidney Disease (RENAL-DES) Study

RIBICHINI, Flavio Luciano;Pighi, Michele;VASSANELLI, Corrado
2014-01-01

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with chronic kidney disease have shown suboptimal results. Drug-eluting stents (DES) might reduce the rate of target vessel revascularization in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, given the multiple concomitant individual variables present in such patients, the comparison of neointimal growth after percutaneous coronary intervention is complex and difficult to assess.
2014
drug-eluting stents; percutaneous coronary intervention; renal insufficiency; renal insufficiency, chronic; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Comorbidity; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Endpoint Determination; Everolimus; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Drug-Eluting Stents; Stents
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/933559
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
social impact