OBJECTIVES: To assess analytical imprecision and comparability of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) on Abbott Sapphire, Mindray BC6800, Siemens Advia 2120 and Sysmex XE-5000. DESIGN AND METHODS: Within-run imprecision was assessed on three pools and comparability using 132 inpatient samples. RESULTS: The imprecision of RDW was comprised between 0.3 and 1.2%, but the values exhibited broad variation among different analyzers, with bias exceeding the desirable quality specifications. CONCLUSIONS: Harmonization of RDW is still an unmet need.

Lack of harmonization of red blood cell distribution width (RDW). Evaluation of four hematological analyzers.

LIPPI, Giuseppe;
2014-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess analytical imprecision and comparability of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) on Abbott Sapphire, Mindray BC6800, Siemens Advia 2120 and Sysmex XE-5000. DESIGN AND METHODS: Within-run imprecision was assessed on three pools and comparability using 132 inpatient samples. RESULTS: The imprecision of RDW was comprised between 0.3 and 1.2%, but the values exhibited broad variation among different analyzers, with bias exceeding the desirable quality specifications. CONCLUSIONS: Harmonization of RDW is still an unmet need.
2014
RDW; Harmonization; quality specifications
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/774568
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 33
  • Scopus 100
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 98
social impact