Study design:Topical review of the literature.Objectives:The evaluation of patients with myelopathies requires radiological investigations; however, for the correct interpretation of the neuroimaging findings, the functional assessment of corticospinal conduction is helpful or even mandatory in many conditions. The objective of this review article was to assess the utility of the motor evoked potentials ( MEPs) in diagnosis and management of the most frequent spinal cord disorders.Setting:Salzburg ( Austria) and Merano ( Italy).Methods:A MEDLINE search was performed using following terms: 'motor evoked potentials', 'transcranial magnetic stimulation', 'central motor conduction', 'compressive myelopathy', 'spinal cord infarction', 'spinal cord injury', 'syringomyelia', 'myelitis', 'hereditary spastic paraparesis', 'subacute combined degeneration' and 'hepatic myelopathy'.Results:Central motor conduction abnormalities can be detected also in the absence of neuroradiological abnormalities-for example, in patients with subacute combined degeneration or hepatic myelopathy. In the most frequent patients with compressive myelopathies, MEPs were found to be very helpful in determining the functional significance of neuroimaging findings. MEP recording can supplement clinical examination and neuroimaging findings also in the assessment of the spinal cord injury level. In patients with spinal cord infarction, the MEP study can demonstrate spinal involvement even when radiological evidence for spinal cord damage is absent or equivocal, thus allowing an important early diagnosis.Conclusion:MEPs represent a highly sensitive and accurate diagnostic tool in many different spinal cord disorders. MEPs can also be useful in follow-up evaluation of motor function during treatment and rehabilitation.

Central motor conduction studies in patients with spinal cord disorders: a review.

BRIGO, Francesco;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Study design:Topical review of the literature.Objectives:The evaluation of patients with myelopathies requires radiological investigations; however, for the correct interpretation of the neuroimaging findings, the functional assessment of corticospinal conduction is helpful or even mandatory in many conditions. The objective of this review article was to assess the utility of the motor evoked potentials ( MEPs) in diagnosis and management of the most frequent spinal cord disorders.Setting:Salzburg ( Austria) and Merano ( Italy).Methods:A MEDLINE search was performed using following terms: 'motor evoked potentials', 'transcranial magnetic stimulation', 'central motor conduction', 'compressive myelopathy', 'spinal cord infarction', 'spinal cord injury', 'syringomyelia', 'myelitis', 'hereditary spastic paraparesis', 'subacute combined degeneration' and 'hepatic myelopathy'.Results:Central motor conduction abnormalities can be detected also in the absence of neuroradiological abnormalities-for example, in patients with subacute combined degeneration or hepatic myelopathy. In the most frequent patients with compressive myelopathies, MEPs were found to be very helpful in determining the functional significance of neuroimaging findings. MEP recording can supplement clinical examination and neuroimaging findings also in the assessment of the spinal cord injury level. In patients with spinal cord infarction, the MEP study can demonstrate spinal involvement even when radiological evidence for spinal cord damage is absent or equivocal, thus allowing an important early diagnosis.Conclusion:MEPs represent a highly sensitive and accurate diagnostic tool in many different spinal cord disorders. MEPs can also be useful in follow-up evaluation of motor function during treatment and rehabilitation.
2014
motor evoked potentials,MEPs,assessment,spinal cord disorders,diagnosis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/716772
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact