Objective: Review the literature concerning transperineal transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (PBx), providing an update on the topic. Methods: The literature review was performed using PubMed through a free text search strategy. The authors reviewed the abstracts of the retrieved records to select the relevant papers. Results: The search retrieved 196 records; 68 were relevant to the issue. No high-level evidence recommends a particular kind of preparation/prophylaxis for transperineal PBx. It can be performed with a brachytherapy template under general or spinal anesthesia, or with a local periprostatic nerve block through a single-access fan technique. In the former case, up to 50 cores are obtained; in the latter, 12-26 cores. Prostate cancer detection rates range from 24% to 51%, with figures of 27-49% in patients undergoing their first PBx for a prostate-specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml. Such percentages are directly related to the number of cores obtained. In repeat biopsy and in prostates > 50 cc, the number of cores should be increased, paying particular attention in sampling the anterior zone. Among the studies comparing transrectal and transperineal PBx, only two demonstrated differences in detection rates in favor of the transperineal approach. Major complications are rare, with fever occurring in 0-5.2% and hospitalization in 0-1.4% of cases. Conclusion: Transperineal TRUS-guided PBx is a safe procedure, with high detection rates and wide applications both in first and in repeat sampling. Although having a strong rationale, the transperineal approach has so far not resulted in higher detection rates than transrectal biopsies. © 2007 European Association of Urology and European Board of Urology.

Prostate Biopsy: The Transperineal ApproachA figure is presented

CAVALLERI, STEFANO;
2007

Abstract

Objective: Review the literature concerning transperineal transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (PBx), providing an update on the topic. Methods: The literature review was performed using PubMed through a free text search strategy. The authors reviewed the abstracts of the retrieved records to select the relevant papers. Results: The search retrieved 196 records; 68 were relevant to the issue. No high-level evidence recommends a particular kind of preparation/prophylaxis for transperineal PBx. It can be performed with a brachytherapy template under general or spinal anesthesia, or with a local periprostatic nerve block through a single-access fan technique. In the former case, up to 50 cores are obtained; in the latter, 12-26 cores. Prostate cancer detection rates range from 24% to 51%, with figures of 27-49% in patients undergoing their first PBx for a prostate-specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml. Such percentages are directly related to the number of cores obtained. In repeat biopsy and in prostates > 50 cc, the number of cores should be increased, paying particular attention in sampling the anterior zone. Among the studies comparing transrectal and transperineal PBx, only two demonstrated differences in detection rates in favor of the transperineal approach. Major complications are rare, with fever occurring in 0-5.2% and hospitalization in 0-1.4% of cases. Conclusion: Transperineal TRUS-guided PBx is a safe procedure, with high detection rates and wide applications both in first and in repeat sampling. Although having a strong rationale, the transperineal approach has so far not resulted in higher detection rates than transrectal biopsies. © 2007 European Association of Urology and European Board of Urology.
Prostate biopsy, Prostate cancer, Transperineal, Transrectal, TRUS
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/538780
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact