The diagnostic or test-performance process, as associated to the evaluation or diagnosis of hemostasis and thrombosis and related disorders, is influenced or controlled by the activity of a large number of professional, expert, and government organizations. These may be involved in driving standardization or harmonization, providing professional or expert guidelines, or in regulation of therapeutic products and diagnostic products such as in vitro diagnostic devices or reagents (IVDs). Although all organizations involved in this activity would propose an intention to drive improvements in diagnostics and human health and although there are benefits to the overall process of standardization and regulation for tests of hemostasis and thrombosis, it should also be recognized there are several specific problems and limitations to this process. As highlighted in this report, which specifically relates to the regulation of IVDs, several case studies are used as examples to show that regulation, aimed to reduce risks associated with the implementation of diagnostic testing, may instead encourage the adverse outcome of locking out clinically useful, new, and improved technologies and locking in old and outdated technologies. This has a potential for significant adverse outcomes related to the clinical diagnosis and management of hemostasis and thrombosis-related disorders.

Regulation in Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Part I-In Vitro Diagnostics.

LIPPI, Giuseppe
2013

Abstract

The diagnostic or test-performance process, as associated to the evaluation or diagnosis of hemostasis and thrombosis and related disorders, is influenced or controlled by the activity of a large number of professional, expert, and government organizations. These may be involved in driving standardization or harmonization, providing professional or expert guidelines, or in regulation of therapeutic products and diagnostic products such as in vitro diagnostic devices or reagents (IVDs). Although all organizations involved in this activity would propose an intention to drive improvements in diagnostics and human health and although there are benefits to the overall process of standardization and regulation for tests of hemostasis and thrombosis, it should also be recognized there are several specific problems and limitations to this process. As highlighted in this report, which specifically relates to the regulation of IVDs, several case studies are used as examples to show that regulation, aimed to reduce risks associated with the implementation of diagnostic testing, may instead encourage the adverse outcome of locking out clinically useful, new, and improved technologies and locking in old and outdated technologies. This has a potential for significant adverse outcomes related to the clinical diagnosis and management of hemostasis and thrombosis-related disorders.
diagnostic; hemostasis; thrombosis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11562/536550
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact