In the present multicenter study, 120 pts who had been treated by both hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) for at least 6 months each, were invited to answer questions on 34 matters, to compare symptoms and their well-being while on the two treatments. Patients were invited to choose HD or CAPD and indicate the reasons for their choice. For 28 patients the first treatment was HD and for 92 CAPD. The mean time between the change of therapy and the study was 46 +/- 35 months. Their final choices were found to be strictly related to the present treatment (p < 0.001). The reasons for choice of CAPD were: more free time (21%), more freedom (67%), better well-being (44%), less worry (5%); for HD they were: more free time (53%), better well-being (39%), less worry (13%), no need for a peritoneal catheter and fewer clinical complications (19%). The catheter was considered more cumbersome than the A.V. fistula, the time involved was considered to be shorter on HD by 52 patients and on CAPD by 39, thirst and cramps were considered to be more frequent and severe on CAPD by half of the patients. The prevalence and severity of problems and symptoms and choice of treatment were not related to sex, job, education or age.
Well being in patients on CAPD and hemodialysis
LUPO, Antonio;
1994-01-01
Abstract
In the present multicenter study, 120 pts who had been treated by both hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) for at least 6 months each, were invited to answer questions on 34 matters, to compare symptoms and their well-being while on the two treatments. Patients were invited to choose HD or CAPD and indicate the reasons for their choice. For 28 patients the first treatment was HD and for 92 CAPD. The mean time between the change of therapy and the study was 46 +/- 35 months. Their final choices were found to be strictly related to the present treatment (p < 0.001). The reasons for choice of CAPD were: more free time (21%), more freedom (67%), better well-being (44%), less worry (5%); for HD they were: more free time (53%), better well-being (39%), less worry (13%), no need for a peritoneal catheter and fewer clinical complications (19%). The catheter was considered more cumbersome than the A.V. fistula, the time involved was considered to be shorter on HD by 52 patients and on CAPD by 39, thirst and cramps were considered to be more frequent and severe on CAPD by half of the patients. The prevalence and severity of problems and symptoms and choice of treatment were not related to sex, job, education or age.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
