Discontinuity between antecedent and relative clause in German is very frequent with respect to other languages. Discontinuity in a verb second language of the OV type like German requires necessarily the lexicalization of the Nachfeld of the matrix clause. While adjacency in German is allowed for every relative clause within every field of the matrix clause, discontinuity is subject to restrictions, which concern, in the first place, the difference between restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. The aim of this work is to outline these restrictions and to provide an explanation of the grammaticality or ungrammaticality of each case of discontinuity (Vorfeld-Mittelfeld, Vorfeld-Nachfeld and Mittelfeld-Nachfeld) for each of the two typologies of relative clause taken into account (restrictive and non-restrictive). The results are based on the evidence that RCs in German are assigned two different syntactical derivations: Head Raising Analysis (Kayne, 1994) for restrictive and Matching Analysis for non-restrictive RCs (Sauerland, 1998).

The position of Relative clauses in German

RESI, ROSSELLA
2011

Abstract

Discontinuity between antecedent and relative clause in German is very frequent with respect to other languages. Discontinuity in a verb second language of the OV type like German requires necessarily the lexicalization of the Nachfeld of the matrix clause. While adjacency in German is allowed for every relative clause within every field of the matrix clause, discontinuity is subject to restrictions, which concern, in the first place, the difference between restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. The aim of this work is to outline these restrictions and to provide an explanation of the grammaticality or ungrammaticality of each case of discontinuity (Vorfeld-Mittelfeld, Vorfeld-Nachfeld and Mittelfeld-Nachfeld) for each of the two typologies of relative clause taken into account (restrictive and non-restrictive). The results are based on the evidence that RCs in German are assigned two different syntactical derivations: Head Raising Analysis (Kayne, 1994) for restrictive and Matching Analysis for non-restrictive RCs (Sauerland, 1998).
Relative clauses; German; restrictive relative clauses; non-restrictive relative clauses; extraposition
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Resi_Abstract_Lingue e Linguaggio.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 70.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
70.64 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11562/511167
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact