24,25(OH)2D3 has been compared with 1,25(OH)2D3 in the treatment of renal osteodystrophy. Treatment with 24, 25(OH)2D3 2 micrograms/day for 5-7 months was accompanied by deterioration in clinical, biochemical, radiological and histological features of osteodystrophy with no increase in Ca absorption. In contrast, treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3 0.25--1 microgram/day for 6-15 months resulted in rapid improvement in clinical, biochemical, radiological and histological features and a return of Ca absorption to normal. It is concluded that in the dose used 24,25(OH)2D3 alone is not an effective treatment for renal osteodystrophy.
Titolo: | Comparison of 1,25(OH)2D3 and 24,25(OH)2D3 in the long-term treatment of renal osteodystrophy | |
Autori: | ||
Data di pubblicazione: | 1980 | |
Rivista: | ||
Abstract: | 24,25(OH)2D3 has been compared with 1,25(OH)2D3 in the treatment of renal osteodystrophy. Treatment with 24, 25(OH)2D3 2 micrograms/day for 5-7 months was accompanied by deterioration in clinical, biochemical, radiological and histological features of osteodystrophy with no increase in Ca absorption. In contrast, treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3 0.25--1 microgram/day for 6-15 months resulted in rapid improvement in clinical, biochemical, radiological and histological features and a return of Ca absorption to normal. It is concluded that in the dose used 24,25(OH)2D3 alone is not an effective treatment for renal osteodystrophy. | |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11562/4915 | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 01.01 Articolo in Rivista |