BACKGROUND: Psychiatric patients have more physical health problems and much shorter life expectancies compared to the general population, due primarily to premature cardiovascular disease. A multi-causal model which includes a higher prevalence of risk factors has provided a valid explanation. It takes into consideration not only risks such as gender, age and family history that are inherently non-modifiable, but also those such as obesity, smoking, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia that are modifiable through behavioural changes and improved care. Thus, it is crucial to focus on factors that increase cardiovascular risk. Obesity in particular has been associated with both the lifestyle habits and the side effects of antipsychotic medications. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims at collecting and updating available evidence on the efficacy of non-pharmacological health promotion programmes for psychotic patients in randomised clinical trials.METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials from 1990 onwards, in which psychoeducational and/or cognitive-behavioural interventions aimed at weight loss or prevention of weight gain in patients with psychosis had been compared to treatment as usual. We carried on a meta-analysis pooling the results of the studies, with Body Mass Index as primary outcome.RESULTS: The results of the meta-analysis show an effect towards the experimental group. At the end of the intervention phase there is a -0.98 kg/m2 reduction in the mean Body Mass Index of psychotic subjects. Notably, prevention studies with individual psychoeducational programmes that include diet and/or physical activity seem to have the highest impact.CONCLUSIONS: When compared with treatment as usual in psychotic patients, preventive and individual lifestyle interventions that include diet and physical activity prove to be effective in reducing weight. Physical screening and monitoring programmes are well accepted by patients and can be implemented in a variety of settings. A weight loss of 0.98 points in the Body Mass Index corresponds to a loss of 3.12% of the initial weight. This percentage is below the 5% to 10% weight loss deemed sufficient to improve weight-related complications such as hypertension, type II diabetes and dyslipidaemia. However, it is reported that outcomes associated with metabolic risk factors may have greater health implications than weight changes alone. Therefore, in addition to weight reduction, the assessment of metabolic parameters to monitor other independent risk factors should also be integrated into physical health promotion and management in people with mental disorders.

Health promotion lifestyle interventions for weight management in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BONFIOLI, Elena;BERTI, Loretta;GOSS, Claudia;Muraro, Francesca;BURTI, Lorenzo
2012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric patients have more physical health problems and much shorter life expectancies compared to the general population, due primarily to premature cardiovascular disease. A multi-causal model which includes a higher prevalence of risk factors has provided a valid explanation. It takes into consideration not only risks such as gender, age and family history that are inherently non-modifiable, but also those such as obesity, smoking, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia that are modifiable through behavioural changes and improved care. Thus, it is crucial to focus on factors that increase cardiovascular risk. Obesity in particular has been associated with both the lifestyle habits and the side effects of antipsychotic medications. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims at collecting and updating available evidence on the efficacy of non-pharmacological health promotion programmes for psychotic patients in randomised clinical trials.METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials from 1990 onwards, in which psychoeducational and/or cognitive-behavioural interventions aimed at weight loss or prevention of weight gain in patients with psychosis had been compared to treatment as usual. We carried on a meta-analysis pooling the results of the studies, with Body Mass Index as primary outcome.RESULTS: The results of the meta-analysis show an effect towards the experimental group. At the end of the intervention phase there is a -0.98 kg/m2 reduction in the mean Body Mass Index of psychotic subjects. Notably, prevention studies with individual psychoeducational programmes that include diet and/or physical activity seem to have the highest impact.CONCLUSIONS: When compared with treatment as usual in psychotic patients, preventive and individual lifestyle interventions that include diet and physical activity prove to be effective in reducing weight. Physical screening and monitoring programmes are well accepted by patients and can be implemented in a variety of settings. A weight loss of 0.98 points in the Body Mass Index corresponds to a loss of 3.12% of the initial weight. This percentage is below the 5% to 10% weight loss deemed sufficient to improve weight-related complications such as hypertension, type II diabetes and dyslipidaemia. However, it is reported that outcomes associated with metabolic risk factors may have greater health implications than weight changes alone. Therefore, in addition to weight reduction, the assessment of metabolic parameters to monitor other independent risk factors should also be integrated into physical health promotion and management in people with mental disorders.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
art%3A10.1186%2F1471-244X-12-78.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: CC BY 2.0 Publisher's version
Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 636.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
636.95 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11562/440137
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 31
  • Scopus 100
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 95
social impact