Aims – The Diagnostic Interview for Psychoses (DIP) is a comprehensive interview schedule for psychotic disorders,linked to the OPCRIT diagnostic algorithm, bridging the gap between fully structured, lay-administered schedules and semistructured,psychiatrist-administered interviews. Here we describe the validity, reliability and applications of the Italian version ofthe DIP. Methods – The interview was translated into Italian and its content validity tested by back translation. Sixty patients,drawn from among those who contacted the South-Verona Community Mental Health Service, were included in the study. Eachpatient was first assessed independently by two raters, one of whom conducted the interview, while the other assumed the role ofobserver. Subsequently (median: 89 days), 44 of these patients were re-interviewed by a third rater, who made an independentassessment. Diagnostic validity was assessed in 18 cases, interviewed with the DIP and using the SCAN as ‘gold standard’. Results– The mean duration of the interview was 37 minutes for the inter-rater interviews and 39 minutes for the retest interviews. Goodto excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for both ICD-10 and DSM-IV diagnoses, while in the test-retest reliabilitypairwise agreement was high for half of the items. Diagnostic validity was good, with twelve out of the 18 DIP-OPCRIT diagnoses(67%) matching the SCAN diagnosis. Conclusions – Overall, the results support the reliability and validity of the Italian translationof the DIP. The Italian version will be useful both in routine practice to establish standard reference diagnoses of psychosisand in the research field, where it can be used by academic researchers in clinical trials and epidemiological studies.

Diagnosing psychotic disorders: validity, reliability and applications of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis (DIP) Italian version

ROSSI, Alberto
;
AMADDEO, Francesco;SANDRI, Marco;GRIGOLETTI, Laura;FERRO, Adele;DONISI, Valeria;TANSELLA, Michele;
2010-01-01

Abstract

Aims – The Diagnostic Interview for Psychoses (DIP) is a comprehensive interview schedule for psychotic disorders,linked to the OPCRIT diagnostic algorithm, bridging the gap between fully structured, lay-administered schedules and semistructured,psychiatrist-administered interviews. Here we describe the validity, reliability and applications of the Italian version ofthe DIP. Methods – The interview was translated into Italian and its content validity tested by back translation. Sixty patients,drawn from among those who contacted the South-Verona Community Mental Health Service, were included in the study. Eachpatient was first assessed independently by two raters, one of whom conducted the interview, while the other assumed the role ofobserver. Subsequently (median: 89 days), 44 of these patients were re-interviewed by a third rater, who made an independentassessment. Diagnostic validity was assessed in 18 cases, interviewed with the DIP and using the SCAN as ‘gold standard’. Results– The mean duration of the interview was 37 minutes for the inter-rater interviews and 39 minutes for the retest interviews. Goodto excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for both ICD-10 and DSM-IV diagnoses, while in the test-retest reliabilitypairwise agreement was high for half of the items. Diagnostic validity was good, with twelve out of the 18 DIP-OPCRIT diagnoses(67%) matching the SCAN diagnosis. Conclusions – Overall, the results support the reliability and validity of the Italian translationof the DIP. The Italian version will be useful both in routine practice to establish standard reference diagnoses of psychosisand in the research field, where it can be used by academic researchers in clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
2010
Psichiatria; psychiatric diagnostic structured interviews; psychotic disorders; reliability study; Cohen’s Kappa.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/361600
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact