We tested the hypothesis that, after bed rest, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) decreases more upright than supine, because of adequate cardiovascular response supine, but not upright. On 9 subjects, we determined VO2max and maximal cardiac output (Q ) upright and supine, before and after (reambulation day upright, the following day supine) 35-day bed rest, by classical steady state protocol. Oxygen consumption, heart rate (f(H)) and stroke volume (Q(st)) were measured by a metabolic cart, electrocardiography and Modelflow from pulse pressure profiles, respectively. We computed Q as f(H) times Q(st), and systemic oxygen flow (QaO2) as Q. times arterial oxygen concentration, obtained after haemoglobin and arterial oxygen saturation measurements. Before bed rest, all parameters at maximal exercise were similar upright and supine. After bed rest, VO2max was lower (p<0.05) than before, both upright (-38.6%) and supine (-17.0%), being 30.8% higher supine than upright. Maximal Q(st) decreased upright (-44.3%), but not supine (+3.7%), being 98.9% higher supine than upright. Maximal Q decreased upright (-45.1%), but not supine (+9.0%), being higher supine than upright (+98.4%). Maximal QaO2 decreased upright (-37.8%), but not supine (+14.8%), being higher (+74.8%) upright than supine. After bed rest, the cardiovascular response (i) did not affect VO2max supine, (ii) partially explained the VO2max decrease upright, and (iii) caused the VO2max differences between postures. We speculate that impaired peripheral oxygen transfer and/or utilisation may explain the VO2max decrease supine and the fraction of VO2max decrease upright unexplained by cardiovascular responses.

Cardiovascular determinants of maximal oxygen consumption in upright and supine posture at the end of prolonged bed rest in humans.

POGLIAGHI, Silvia;ADAMI, Alessandra;DE ROIA, Gabriela Fernanda;CAPELLI, Carlo;
2010-01-01

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that, after bed rest, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) decreases more upright than supine, because of adequate cardiovascular response supine, but not upright. On 9 subjects, we determined VO2max and maximal cardiac output (Q ) upright and supine, before and after (reambulation day upright, the following day supine) 35-day bed rest, by classical steady state protocol. Oxygen consumption, heart rate (f(H)) and stroke volume (Q(st)) were measured by a metabolic cart, electrocardiography and Modelflow from pulse pressure profiles, respectively. We computed Q as f(H) times Q(st), and systemic oxygen flow (QaO2) as Q. times arterial oxygen concentration, obtained after haemoglobin and arterial oxygen saturation measurements. Before bed rest, all parameters at maximal exercise were similar upright and supine. After bed rest, VO2max was lower (p<0.05) than before, both upright (-38.6%) and supine (-17.0%), being 30.8% higher supine than upright. Maximal Q(st) decreased upright (-44.3%), but not supine (+3.7%), being 98.9% higher supine than upright. Maximal Q decreased upright (-45.1%), but not supine (+9.0%), being higher supine than upright (+98.4%). Maximal QaO2 decreased upright (-37.8%), but not supine (+14.8%), being higher (+74.8%) upright than supine. After bed rest, the cardiovascular response (i) did not affect VO2max supine, (ii) partially explained the VO2max decrease upright, and (iii) caused the VO2max differences between postures. We speculate that impaired peripheral oxygen transfer and/or utilisation may explain the VO2max decrease supine and the fraction of VO2max decrease upright unexplained by cardiovascular responses.
2010
Exercise capacity; Cardiac output; Cardiovascular response; Simulated microgravity
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/341353
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact