Objective: It is widely acknowledged that identification and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) results in better maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, the utility of glucose challenge test (GCT) remains controversial regarding the diagnostic approach and decision making. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on the database of out Laboratory Information System to retrieve results of GCT and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which were performed on consecutive female outpatients referred by the gynecologists over the last 3 years. Results: Cumulative results for GCT and OGTT were retrieved for 724 female outpatients and screening test was abnormal in 114 of them. This group was classified in terms of normal glucose tolerance (NGT), one abnormal value for the 100-g-3h OGTT (OAV) and GDM. GDM was diagnosed only in 34 subjects (4.7%). No statistically significant differences were observed in the basal plasma glucose and 1-h GCT values among groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, OGTT values ≥ 180 mg/dL at 1 hour and OGTT values ≥155 mg/dL at 2 hours, but not GCT values, were independent predictors for GDM (p=0.048, p=0.012 and p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Results of our retrospective analysis on an unselected population are consistent with the hypothesis that GCT is not predictive of GDM and its diagnostic significance remains questionable. © 2008 The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine.
Glucose challenge test does not predict gestational diabetes mellitus.
Montagnana M.;Lippi G.;Targher G.;Fava C.;Guidi G. C.
2008-01-01
Abstract
Objective: It is widely acknowledged that identification and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) results in better maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, the utility of glucose challenge test (GCT) remains controversial regarding the diagnostic approach and decision making. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on the database of out Laboratory Information System to retrieve results of GCT and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which were performed on consecutive female outpatients referred by the gynecologists over the last 3 years. Results: Cumulative results for GCT and OGTT were retrieved for 724 female outpatients and screening test was abnormal in 114 of them. This group was classified in terms of normal glucose tolerance (NGT), one abnormal value for the 100-g-3h OGTT (OAV) and GDM. GDM was diagnosed only in 34 subjects (4.7%). No statistically significant differences were observed in the basal plasma glucose and 1-h GCT values among groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, OGTT values ≥ 180 mg/dL at 1 hour and OGTT values ≥155 mg/dL at 2 hours, but not GCT values, were independent predictors for GDM (p=0.048, p=0.012 and p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Results of our retrospective analysis on an unselected population are consistent with the hypothesis that GCT is not predictive of GDM and its diagnostic significance remains questionable. © 2008 The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
