This observational study describes the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods and interpretive criteria used in European hospitals during 2001, focusing specifically on detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Of 263 hospitals that took part in the ARPAC study, 192 submitted data on AST. Of these, 89% (n = 170) routinely used a disk-diffusion AST method, 43% (n = 82) used a semi-automated method, and 70% (n = 135) routinely determined MICs. Hospitals in southern Europe were less likely to use disk-diffusion, but were more likely to use a semi-automated method (p <0.001). In total, 173 (90%) interpreted AST results using CLSI breakpoints; 30% of these detected MRSA using unmodified CLSI disk-diffusion methods, while 35% used the unmodified CLSI agar-screening method for MRSA; 41% and 30% adhered to unmodified CLSI methodology for disk-diffusion and agar-screening, respectively, to detect VRE. Some of the modifications made may have greatly reduced the ability of the tests to detect MRSA/VRE. For example, 20% of respondents used excessively high incubation temperatures and 13% used inadequate incubation times to detect MRSA by disk-diffusion, and 28% used Mueller-Hinton agar instead of brain-heart infusion agar in VRE screening plates. The majority of respondents stated that they followed CLSI guidelines, but a high proportion had modified the CLSI methods for detecting MRSA and VRE, which may compromise clinical management and antimicrobial resistance surveillance.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in European hospitals: report from the ARPAC study

CORNAGLIA, Giuseppe;
2006-01-01

Abstract

This observational study describes the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods and interpretive criteria used in European hospitals during 2001, focusing specifically on detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Of 263 hospitals that took part in the ARPAC study, 192 submitted data on AST. Of these, 89% (n = 170) routinely used a disk-diffusion AST method, 43% (n = 82) used a semi-automated method, and 70% (n = 135) routinely determined MICs. Hospitals in southern Europe were less likely to use disk-diffusion, but were more likely to use a semi-automated method (p <0.001). In total, 173 (90%) interpreted AST results using CLSI breakpoints; 30% of these detected MRSA using unmodified CLSI disk-diffusion methods, while 35% used the unmodified CLSI agar-screening method for MRSA; 41% and 30% adhered to unmodified CLSI methodology for disk-diffusion and agar-screening, respectively, to detect VRE. Some of the modifications made may have greatly reduced the ability of the tests to detect MRSA/VRE. For example, 20% of respondents used excessively high incubation temperatures and 13% used inadequate incubation times to detect MRSA by disk-diffusion, and 28% used Mueller-Hinton agar instead of brain-heart infusion agar in VRE screening plates. The majority of respondents stated that they followed CLSI guidelines, but a high proportion had modified the CLSI methods for detecting MRSA and VRE, which may compromise clinical management and antimicrobial resistance surveillance.
antimicrobial susceptibility testing; ARPAC study; detection; European hospitals; MRSA; VRE
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/308914
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact