In human locomotion, the metabolic power required ((E)over dot) to cover a given distance d, in the time t is set by the product of the energy cost of the locomotion (C), i.e. the amount of metabolic energy spent to move over one unit of distance, and the speed (nu = d t(-1)): (E)over dot = C nu = C d t(-1). Since, for any given d, nu is a decreasing function of t and C is either constant or increases with nu, it necessarily follows that (E)over dot is larger the smaller the value of t. Thus, for any given distance and subject, the shortest time will be achieved when (E)over dot is equal to the individual maximal metabolic power ((E)over dot (max)). In turn, (E)over dot (max) is a decreasing function of t: it depends upon the subject's maximal aerobic power (MAP) and on the maximal amount of energy derived from the full utilisation of anaerobic energy stores (AnS). So, if the relationship between C and nu in the locomotion at stake and the subject's MAP and AnS are known, his best performance time (BPT) over any given distance can be obtained by solving the equality (E)over dot (max)(t) = (E)over dot(t). This approach has been applied to estimate individual BPTs in running and cycling. In this paper, the above approach will be used to quantify the role of C, MAP, and AnS in determining BPTs for running, track cycling and swimming. This has been achieved by calculating the changes in BPT obtained when each variable, or a combination thereof, is changed by a given percentage. The results show that in all the three types of locomotion, regardless of the speed, the changes in BPT brought about by changes of C alone account for 45-55% of the changes obtained when all three variables (C, MAP and AnS) are changed by the same amount.

Physiological determinants of best performances in human locomotion.

CAPELLI, Carlo
1999-01-01

Abstract

In human locomotion, the metabolic power required ((E)over dot) to cover a given distance d, in the time t is set by the product of the energy cost of the locomotion (C), i.e. the amount of metabolic energy spent to move over one unit of distance, and the speed (nu = d t(-1)): (E)over dot = C nu = C d t(-1). Since, for any given d, nu is a decreasing function of t and C is either constant or increases with nu, it necessarily follows that (E)over dot is larger the smaller the value of t. Thus, for any given distance and subject, the shortest time will be achieved when (E)over dot is equal to the individual maximal metabolic power ((E)over dot (max)). In turn, (E)over dot (max) is a decreasing function of t: it depends upon the subject's maximal aerobic power (MAP) and on the maximal amount of energy derived from the full utilisation of anaerobic energy stores (AnS). So, if the relationship between C and nu in the locomotion at stake and the subject's MAP and AnS are known, his best performance time (BPT) over any given distance can be obtained by solving the equality (E)over dot (max)(t) = (E)over dot(t). This approach has been applied to estimate individual BPTs in running and cycling. In this paper, the above approach will be used to quantify the role of C, MAP, and AnS in determining BPTs for running, track cycling and swimming. This has been achieved by calculating the changes in BPT obtained when each variable, or a combination thereof, is changed by a given percentage. The results show that in all the three types of locomotion, regardless of the speed, the changes in BPT brought about by changes of C alone account for 45-55% of the changes obtained when all three variables (C, MAP and AnS) are changed by the same amount.
1999
maximal metabolic power; energy cost of human locomotion; best performance time
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/307471
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact