Remarks by the first author: This four-hand work, praised by a referee as a breakthrough in the problem of finding a categorical semantics for classical logic, takes off from work by the third author and others on proof-nets for classical logic. Giving a fresh look at Gentzen's sequent calculus, we argue against some identifications of proofs suggested by the proof-net model. One consequence of our analysis is that it is not reasonable to regard proofs as equivalent precisely when they give rise to the same set of normal forms.

Categorical Proof Theory of Classical Propositional Calculus

BELLIN, Gianluigi;
2006-01-01

Abstract

Remarks by the first author: This four-hand work, praised by a referee as a breakthrough in the problem of finding a categorical semantics for classical logic, takes off from work by the third author and others on proof-nets for classical logic. Giving a fresh look at Gentzen's sequent calculus, we argue against some identifications of proofs suggested by the proof-net model. One consequence of our analysis is that it is not reasonable to regard proofs as equivalent precisely when they give rise to the same set of normal forms.
2006
Categorical logic; Proof theory and constructive mathematics; Structure of proofs
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/30361
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact