BACKGROUND: Care for people with schizophrenia should address a wide range of outcomes, including professional and consumer perspectives. AIMS: To measure changes in psychopathology, functioning, needs for care and quality of life; to develop predictive models for each outcome domain; and to assess the frequency of 'good'and'poor' outcomes, as defined in a series of different definitions that use combinations of the four domains measured. METHOD:Three-year follow-up of a 1-year-treated prevalence cohort of 107 patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia attending the South Verona community-based mental health service. RESULTS: Mean symptom severity and some types of needs for care worsen, but quality of life shows no change. Functioning shows a non-significant trend to deteriorate. Between 32% and 42% of the variance in the four key outcomes was explained by our model. Different definitions of 'good'and 'poor' outcome included 0-31% of patients, depending on the definition used. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-year outcome for schizophrenia depends on the domain of outcome used, whether staff or patient ratings are used and the stringency of the definitions used for good and poor outcome.

Heterogeneity of outcomes of schizophrenia: 3 year follow-up for treated prevalent cases.

RUGGERI, Mirella;LASALVIA, Antonio;TANSELLA, Michele;BONETTO, Chiara;
2004-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Care for people with schizophrenia should address a wide range of outcomes, including professional and consumer perspectives. AIMS: To measure changes in psychopathology, functioning, needs for care and quality of life; to develop predictive models for each outcome domain; and to assess the frequency of 'good'and'poor' outcomes, as defined in a series of different definitions that use combinations of the four domains measured. METHOD:Three-year follow-up of a 1-year-treated prevalence cohort of 107 patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia attending the South Verona community-based mental health service. RESULTS: Mean symptom severity and some types of needs for care worsen, but quality of life shows no change. Functioning shows a non-significant trend to deteriorate. Between 32% and 42% of the variance in the four key outcomes was explained by our model. Different definitions of 'good'and 'poor' outcome included 0-31% of patients, depending on the definition used. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-year outcome for schizophrenia depends on the domain of outcome used, whether staff or patient ratings are used and the stringency of the definitions used for good and poor outcome.
2004
Adult; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data; Humans; Male; Mental Health Services/utilization; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Prospective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Schizophrenia/rehabilitation; Schizophrenia/therapy; Schizophrenic Psychology; Statistics as Topic; Treatment Outcome
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/303573
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact