The contribution presents a critical examination of the el- ements of the philosophy of law that emerge from reading a famous work by Henrik Stangerup. The analysis takes into consideration the dystopian perspective offered by the work and seeks to verify the contemporary relevance of certain legal paradigms: ‘guilt’, ‘sanction’ and ‘autono- my’. In this way, the contribution seeks to offer a critical view of the authority inside the contemporary legal sys- tems as it constrains the freedom of the individual in ways that deny the dignity of the person and his relations with other subjects.

"Colpa", "Sanzione" e "Autonomia" nella vicenda di un omicidio negato

Andrea Favaro
2025-01-01

Abstract

The contribution presents a critical examination of the el- ements of the philosophy of law that emerge from reading a famous work by Henrik Stangerup. The analysis takes into consideration the dystopian perspective offered by the work and seeks to verify the contemporary relevance of certain legal paradigms: ‘guilt’, ‘sanction’ and ‘autono- my’. In this way, the contribution seeks to offer a critical view of the authority inside the contemporary legal sys- tems as it constrains the freedom of the individual in ways that deny the dignity of the person and his relations with other subjects.
2025
Stangerup; Sanction; Autonomy; Guilt; Law.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
03_Favaro.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 333.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
333.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1192947
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact