While the conventional lipid panel remains central to the diagnosis and management of dyslipidemia, accumulating evidence supports the clinical significance of ApoB as a marker of atherogenic risk. Nonetheless, transition toward ApoB-centered strategies requires further validation through adequately powered randomized clinical trials, prospective intervention studies, and real-world implementation analyses demonstrating that ApoB-guided therapy improves clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared with current lipid targets. Such evidence will be essential to definitively establish ApoB not only as a superior risk marker, but also as a primary therapeutic target in cardiovascular prevention.

Rethinking atherogenic risk: is apolipoprotein B a better biomarker?

Lippi, Giuseppe
In corso di stampa

Abstract

While the conventional lipid panel remains central to the diagnosis and management of dyslipidemia, accumulating evidence supports the clinical significance of ApoB as a marker of atherogenic risk. Nonetheless, transition toward ApoB-centered strategies requires further validation through adequately powered randomized clinical trials, prospective intervention studies, and real-world implementation analyses demonstrating that ApoB-guided therapy improves clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared with current lipid targets. Such evidence will be essential to definitively establish ApoB not only as a superior risk marker, but also as a primary therapeutic target in cardiovascular prevention.
In corso di stampa
LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, cardiovascular disease, non HDL-cholesterol
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1191947
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact