While the conventional lipid panel remains central to the diagnosis and management of dyslipidemia, accumulating evidence supports the clinical significance of ApoB as a marker of atherogenic risk. Nonetheless, transition toward ApoB-centered strategies requires further validation through adequately powered randomized clinical trials, prospective intervention studies, and real-world implementation analyses demonstrating that ApoB-guided therapy improves clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared with current lipid targets. Such evidence will be essential to definitively establish ApoB not only as a superior risk marker, but also as a primary therapeutic target in cardiovascular prevention.

Rethinking atherogenic risk: is apolipoprotein B a better biomarker?

Lippi, Giuseppe
2026-01-01

Abstract

While the conventional lipid panel remains central to the diagnosis and management of dyslipidemia, accumulating evidence supports the clinical significance of ApoB as a marker of atherogenic risk. Nonetheless, transition toward ApoB-centered strategies requires further validation through adequately powered randomized clinical trials, prospective intervention studies, and real-world implementation analyses demonstrating that ApoB-guided therapy improves clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared with current lipid targets. Such evidence will be essential to definitively establish ApoB not only as a superior risk marker, but also as a primary therapeutic target in cardiovascular prevention.
2026
LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, cardiovascular disease, non HDL-cholesterol
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1191947
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact