Background: Data regarding treatment in pediatric relapsing MOGAD are limited. Objective: To evaluate response of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) compared to other therapies in relapsing pediatric MOGAD. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, children with MOGAD were recruited from different medical centers. Inclusion criteria encompassed: age <18 years, MOGAD diagnosis, relapsing disease course, >6 months of maintenance treatment and >12 months follow-up. Results: Seventy children with relapsing MOGAD were stratified into two groups. The first group received IVIG alone (n = 23), IVIG preceded by (n = 16) or in combination with other immunomodulating therapies (IMT) (n = 7). The second group received mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, rituximab, or other IMTs (n = 24). 13 % (6/46) of patients with IVIG relapsed in the first year, compared to 33 % (8/24) in the IMT group (relative risk 0.70, 95 % CI 0.53 to 0.99, p = 0.061). Annual relapse rate (ARR) was decreased under therapy compared to pre-treatment in both groups (IVIG: p < 0.001; other IMTs: p = 0.006). ARR was lower in the IVIG group (p = 0.040) in addition to a reduced risk of an early relapse compared to the other IMT group (hazard ratio 0.36, 95 % CI 0.15 to 0.87, p = 0.023). Conclusion: Our study supports monthly IVIG as maintenance therapy in children after the second MOGAD episode.

Treatment response in children with relapsing MOG-antibody associated disease

Mariotto, Sara;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Data regarding treatment in pediatric relapsing MOGAD are limited. Objective: To evaluate response of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) compared to other therapies in relapsing pediatric MOGAD. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, children with MOGAD were recruited from different medical centers. Inclusion criteria encompassed: age <18 years, MOGAD diagnosis, relapsing disease course, >6 months of maintenance treatment and >12 months follow-up. Results: Seventy children with relapsing MOGAD were stratified into two groups. The first group received IVIG alone (n = 23), IVIG preceded by (n = 16) or in combination with other immunomodulating therapies (IMT) (n = 7). The second group received mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, rituximab, or other IMTs (n = 24). 13 % (6/46) of patients with IVIG relapsed in the first year, compared to 33 % (8/24) in the IMT group (relative risk 0.70, 95 % CI 0.53 to 0.99, p = 0.061). Annual relapse rate (ARR) was decreased under therapy compared to pre-treatment in both groups (IVIG: p < 0.001; other IMTs: p = 0.006). ARR was lower in the IVIG group (p = 0.040) in addition to a reduced risk of an early relapse compared to the other IMT group (hazard ratio 0.36, 95 % CI 0.15 to 0.87, p = 0.023). Conclusion: Our study supports monthly IVIG as maintenance therapy in children after the second MOGAD episode.
2025
pediatric relapsing MOGAD
intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)
treatment
therapy
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1174370
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact