Background: The outcome of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) in Parkinson's disease carriers of GBA1 mutations (GBA-PD) remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of LCIG in a large PD cohort, focusing on GBA1 variants. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal "real-world" study included consecutive patients with advanced PD treated with LCIG at 31 Italian centers; data were collected at baseline, 1-, 5-year, and last-available follow-up. Results: Data from 512 PD patients (59% male, mean age and disease duration at LCIG initiation 67.0 ± 8.0 and 12.9 ± 5.0 years, respectively) were analyzed. GBA1 genotyping was available for 306 patients (60%), of whom 40 (13%) had GBA1 mutations or risk variants. Mean follow-up on LCIG was 3.9 ± 2.9 years; 5-year follow-up data were available for 159 subjects. At baseline, GBA-PD had a younger age, shorter PD duration, worse cognition, and more hallucinations than noncarriers. At 1- and 5-year follow-up, LCIG improved motor and non-motor symptoms, OFF-time, and dyskinesias in the entire population. In GBA-PD, MDS-UPDRS parts I, II, and III scores did not change, while part IV score improved significantly less than in noncarriers; cognition and orthostatic hypotension symptoms worsened more rapidly. Multivariate analysis of predictors for adverse events and LCIG discontinuation found no significant contribution from GBA1 mutation status. Conclusions: GBA1 status does not increase the risk of adverse events or LCIG discontinuation. LCIG is a safe option for advanced GBA-PD, even in patients with cognitive impairment at baseline. However, GBA-PD experiences lower efficacy on motor disability and complications and faster cognitive decline than noncarriers.

Effects of GBA1 Variants in Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel: A Nation-Wide, Multicenter, Longitudinal, "Real-World" Study. The EPIC Study

Tamburin, Stefano;Tinazzi, Michele;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: The outcome of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) in Parkinson's disease carriers of GBA1 mutations (GBA-PD) remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of LCIG in a large PD cohort, focusing on GBA1 variants. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal "real-world" study included consecutive patients with advanced PD treated with LCIG at 31 Italian centers; data were collected at baseline, 1-, 5-year, and last-available follow-up. Results: Data from 512 PD patients (59% male, mean age and disease duration at LCIG initiation 67.0 ± 8.0 and 12.9 ± 5.0 years, respectively) were analyzed. GBA1 genotyping was available for 306 patients (60%), of whom 40 (13%) had GBA1 mutations or risk variants. Mean follow-up on LCIG was 3.9 ± 2.9 years; 5-year follow-up data were available for 159 subjects. At baseline, GBA-PD had a younger age, shorter PD duration, worse cognition, and more hallucinations than noncarriers. At 1- and 5-year follow-up, LCIG improved motor and non-motor symptoms, OFF-time, and dyskinesias in the entire population. In GBA-PD, MDS-UPDRS parts I, II, and III scores did not change, while part IV score improved significantly less than in noncarriers; cognition and orthostatic hypotension symptoms worsened more rapidly. Multivariate analysis of predictors for adverse events and LCIG discontinuation found no significant contribution from GBA1 mutation status. Conclusions: GBA1 status does not increase the risk of adverse events or LCIG discontinuation. LCIG is a safe option for advanced GBA-PD, even in patients with cognitive impairment at baseline. However, GBA-PD experiences lower efficacy on motor disability and complications and faster cognitive decline than noncarriers.
2025
GBA1
LCIG
Parkinson's disease
levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel
real world
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1166996
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact