Background/aim: Lipid-lowering therapy prescription is low in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, often not achieving lipid threshold target despite treatment. However, evidence derives from small, monocentric cohorts. We assessed adherence to lipid-lowering treatment for primary cardiovascular (CV) prevention in a RA cohort according to international guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of an Italian RA cohort was performed. Disease-related features and traditional CV risk factors were collected. The 10-year CV risk was estimated by Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE-2) algorithm. The primary preventive dyslipidaemia strategy was assessed according to 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines. Results: 1.133 RA patients (78.2% female, aged 60.6 +/- 10.2 years) free from CV events were included. According to SCORE-2, 42.9% of patients were at moderate risk (1-5-%), 33.3% at high risk (5-10%) and 23.7% at very high risk (>10%). In the whole cohort, 12.9% of patients with <5%, 23.6% with 5-10% and 32.3% with >10% risk were on statin, respectively (p<0.001). According to 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, 51.5% of patients had LDL-c at target. Among patients with LDL-c not at target, 76% were not on lipid-lowering treatment. At multivariate analysis, patients with higher CV risk had significantly lower probability of LDL-c at target. Conclusion: In a wide Italian RA cohort, more than 50% of patients had high or very high CV risk. In these, lipid- lowering treatment prescription is suboptimal leading to not achievement of LDL-c target. Physicians should improve lipid screening and primary prevention therapy to reduce CV risk and improve CV comorbidity in RA patients.

Adherence to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for dyslipidaemia management in a large rheumatoid arthritis cohort: Data from the CORDIS Study Group of the Italian Society of Rheumatology

Viapiana, Ombretta;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background/aim: Lipid-lowering therapy prescription is low in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, often not achieving lipid threshold target despite treatment. However, evidence derives from small, monocentric cohorts. We assessed adherence to lipid-lowering treatment for primary cardiovascular (CV) prevention in a RA cohort according to international guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of an Italian RA cohort was performed. Disease-related features and traditional CV risk factors were collected. The 10-year CV risk was estimated by Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE-2) algorithm. The primary preventive dyslipidaemia strategy was assessed according to 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines. Results: 1.133 RA patients (78.2% female, aged 60.6 +/- 10.2 years) free from CV events were included. According to SCORE-2, 42.9% of patients were at moderate risk (1-5-%), 33.3% at high risk (5-10%) and 23.7% at very high risk (>10%). In the whole cohort, 12.9% of patients with <5%, 23.6% with 5-10% and 32.3% with >10% risk were on statin, respectively (p<0.001). According to 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, 51.5% of patients had LDL-c at target. Among patients with LDL-c not at target, 76% were not on lipid-lowering treatment. At multivariate analysis, patients with higher CV risk had significantly lower probability of LDL-c at target. Conclusion: In a wide Italian RA cohort, more than 50% of patients had high or very high CV risk. In these, lipid- lowering treatment prescription is suboptimal leading to not achievement of LDL-c target. Physicians should improve lipid screening and primary prevention therapy to reduce CV risk and improve CV comorbidity in RA patients.
2025
Atherosclerosis
Cardiovascular
Dyslipidaemia
Lipid
Rheumatoid arthritis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1161358
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact