Identifying the boundary between heavy and severe exercise domains is crucial since it demarcates the transition from sustainable to unsustainable exercise. This systematic review aimed to determine differences and agreement between two indices used to determine this boundary, namely critical power (CP) and maximal lactate steady state (MLSS), and how moderators may affect these differences. Ten out of 782 studies found were included in the meta analyses. Random effect meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the mean differences (MD) between CP and MLSS, and moderators' effect on MD was assessed using meta-regression. CP and MLSS agreement was tested using Bland-Altman meta-analyses on the limits of agreements (LoA) of the MD. Power output (PO) at CP was higher (MD (95% LoA) = 12.42 [-19.23; 44.08] W, p = 0.005) than PO at MLSS, with no differences between CP and MLSS in terms of oxygen uptake (MD (95% LoA) = 0.09 [-0.34; 0.52] L⋅min-1, p = 0.097), heart rate (MD (95% LoA) = 0.61 [-15.84; 17.05] bpm, p = 0.784), and blood lactate concentration (MD (95% LoA) = 1.63 [-2.85; 6.11] mM, p = 0.240). Intensities at CP (p = 0.002) and MLSS (p = 0.010) influenced the MD expressed in W. In conclusion, solely when expressed in PO, CP was higher than MLSS, with larger differences in fitter and younger individuals, emphasizing the possible effect of the indicators used for assessing exercise intensity. Finally, the high interindividual variability observed in the differences between CP and MLSS could compromise their interchangeability in predicting the heavy to severe boundary regardless of the parameter used to assess exercise intensity.

Analysis of the factors influencing the proximity and agreement between critical power and maximal lactate steady state: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Grossi, Tommaso;Pogliaghi, Silvia;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Identifying the boundary between heavy and severe exercise domains is crucial since it demarcates the transition from sustainable to unsustainable exercise. This systematic review aimed to determine differences and agreement between two indices used to determine this boundary, namely critical power (CP) and maximal lactate steady state (MLSS), and how moderators may affect these differences. Ten out of 782 studies found were included in the meta analyses. Random effect meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the mean differences (MD) between CP and MLSS, and moderators' effect on MD was assessed using meta-regression. CP and MLSS agreement was tested using Bland-Altman meta-analyses on the limits of agreements (LoA) of the MD. Power output (PO) at CP was higher (MD (95% LoA) = 12.42 [-19.23; 44.08] W, p = 0.005) than PO at MLSS, with no differences between CP and MLSS in terms of oxygen uptake (MD (95% LoA) = 0.09 [-0.34; 0.52] L⋅min-1, p = 0.097), heart rate (MD (95% LoA) = 0.61 [-15.84; 17.05] bpm, p = 0.784), and blood lactate concentration (MD (95% LoA) = 1.63 [-2.85; 6.11] mM, p = 0.240). Intensities at CP (p = 0.002) and MLSS (p = 0.010) influenced the MD expressed in W. In conclusion, solely when expressed in PO, CP was higher than MLSS, with larger differences in fitter and younger individuals, emphasizing the possible effect of the indicators used for assessing exercise intensity. Finally, the high interindividual variability observed in the differences between CP and MLSS could compromise their interchangeability in predicting the heavy to severe boundary regardless of the parameter used to assess exercise intensity.
2025
Aerobic exercise
Critical power
Exercise intensity domains
Exercise testing
Maximal lactate steady state
Maximal metabolic steady state
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
peerj-19060.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: CC BY 4.0 publisher version
Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.01 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.01 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1158571
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact