Purpose: Measuring trunk extensor muscle endurance is important for identifying non-specific low back pain (LBP) risk factors and prognostic indicators, planning treatment goals, and measuring patient progress. This randomized cross-over study evaluated the reliability and validity of a newly instrumented device for measuring lumbar spine extensor muscle endurance.MethodsThirty healthy men participated in this study. The Biering-Sorensen test (for the endurance time) and the newly invented device (for the number of repetitions) were applied to measure lumbar spine extensor muscle endurance in two separate weeks at a similar time of a day and with the same rater. Test-retest reliability and validity of the devices were examined via an intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC (2,1)], 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), standard errors of the measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and Pearson's correlation coefficient, respectively.ResultsTest-retest reliability of the newly instrumented device demonstrated an excellent level of reliability [ICC (2,1): 0.969; 95% CI: 0.934-0.985; SEM: 2.65 repetition; MDC: 3.75 repetition]; while a moderate to good degree of test-retest reliability was found between the Biering-Sorensen test measurements [ICC (2,1): 0.884; 95% CI: 0.758-0.944; SEM: 13.31 s; MDC: 18.82 s]. Compared to the Biering-Sorensen test, the newly instrumented device had a moderately positive correlation (r = 0.283).ConclusionThe newly instrumented device demonstrated adequate reliability and validity compared with the Biering-Sorensen test. Future studies should assess its clinometric properties in patients with musculoskeletal pain also including female participants.

Test-retest reliability and validity of a newly instrumented device for measuring trunk extensor muscles endurance in healthy male participants: a randomized cross-over study

Smania, N;Rossettini, G
2024-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: Measuring trunk extensor muscle endurance is important for identifying non-specific low back pain (LBP) risk factors and prognostic indicators, planning treatment goals, and measuring patient progress. This randomized cross-over study evaluated the reliability and validity of a newly instrumented device for measuring lumbar spine extensor muscle endurance.MethodsThirty healthy men participated in this study. The Biering-Sorensen test (for the endurance time) and the newly invented device (for the number of repetitions) were applied to measure lumbar spine extensor muscle endurance in two separate weeks at a similar time of a day and with the same rater. Test-retest reliability and validity of the devices were examined via an intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC (2,1)], 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), standard errors of the measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and Pearson's correlation coefficient, respectively.ResultsTest-retest reliability of the newly instrumented device demonstrated an excellent level of reliability [ICC (2,1): 0.969; 95% CI: 0.934-0.985; SEM: 2.65 repetition; MDC: 3.75 repetition]; while a moderate to good degree of test-retest reliability was found between the Biering-Sorensen test measurements [ICC (2,1): 0.884; 95% CI: 0.758-0.944; SEM: 13.31 s; MDC: 18.82 s]. Compared to the Biering-Sorensen test, the newly instrumented device had a moderately positive correlation (r = 0.283).ConclusionThe newly instrumented device demonstrated adequate reliability and validity compared with the Biering-Sorensen test. Future studies should assess its clinometric properties in patients with musculoskeletal pain also including female participants.
2024
Back muscle endurance testing
Instrumented device
Reliability
Validity
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1150867
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact