The Biden administration has been confronted throughout its tenure with a major political-constitutional conflict over freedom of speech in the digital space as guaranteed by the First Amendment. The conflict is to be ascribed to the political-constitutional datum because, on the one hand, it seems to reflect a self-proclaimed ability of conservative political forces to set themselves up as supposed bastions of freedom of speech on the digital place as the ‘marketplace of ideas’. On the other hand, the political forces represented in the Biden administration have never hidden their willingness to take decisive action on the so-called misinformation that conservative political forces have allegedly brought about during the Trump administration, and which continued during the 2024 presidential election campaign. In the topic under discussion, as a result, the U.S. debate struggles to separate the legal datum from the political one, according to a dichotomous mainstream narrative. This consideration leads to question about the role played by the judiciary, and especially the Supreme Court, as an actor capable of standing or not in the role of synthesis (and if so, to what degree of neutrality) that it has often played in U.S. constitutionalism.
The Constitutional Dimension of Free Speech Under the Biden Administration
enrico andreoli
2024-01-01
Abstract
The Biden administration has been confronted throughout its tenure with a major political-constitutional conflict over freedom of speech in the digital space as guaranteed by the First Amendment. The conflict is to be ascribed to the political-constitutional datum because, on the one hand, it seems to reflect a self-proclaimed ability of conservative political forces to set themselves up as supposed bastions of freedom of speech on the digital place as the ‘marketplace of ideas’. On the other hand, the political forces represented in the Biden administration have never hidden their willingness to take decisive action on the so-called misinformation that conservative political forces have allegedly brought about during the Trump administration, and which continued during the 2024 presidential election campaign. In the topic under discussion, as a result, the U.S. debate struggles to separate the legal datum from the political one, according to a dichotomous mainstream narrative. This consideration leads to question about the role played by the judiciary, and especially the Supreme Court, as an actor capable of standing or not in the role of synthesis (and if so, to what degree of neutrality) that it has often played in U.S. constitutionalism.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
13.+ANDREOLI+REV.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Accesso ristretto
Dimensione
289.59 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
289.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.