The results of our analysis in Scopus show that articles on COVID-19 (or SARS-CoV-2) have not been retracted more frequently than those involving other common pathologies such as cancer, sepsis, trauma, Alzheimer’s disease and even diabetes. Nonetheless, the trend of article retractions on COVID-19 and/or SARS-CoV-2 has gradually increased between 2020 and 2023, emphasizing that the urgency of publishing new information on the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 combined with perhaps too rapid and thus inaccurate peer-review should not be seen as the only reasons for article retractions.
Articles’ retraction during the pandemic: COVID-19 is not the pacemaker
Giuseppe Lippi;Camilla Mattiuzzi
In corso di stampa
Abstract
The results of our analysis in Scopus show that articles on COVID-19 (or SARS-CoV-2) have not been retracted more frequently than those involving other common pathologies such as cancer, sepsis, trauma, Alzheimer’s disease and even diabetes. Nonetheless, the trend of article retractions on COVID-19 and/or SARS-CoV-2 has gradually increased between 2020 and 2023, emphasizing that the urgency of publishing new information on the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 combined with perhaps too rapid and thus inaccurate peer-review should not be seen as the only reasons for article retractions.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
