Objective: Biosimilars represent a new opportunity for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment and economic sustainability of therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of the adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 in biologic-naïve vs. biologic-switched IBD patients. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using a database of patients with IBD treated with ABP 501, biologic-naïve or switched from the original, at eight IBD centers. We included adult patients with at least one year of follow-up. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy (persistence) and safety (adverse event rate) of ABP 501 therapy. Results: A total of 118 patients with IBD were included in the analysis: 84 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) (39 women, 45 men, mean age 40.4 ± 14.3 years; 33% biologic-naïve) and 34 patients with ulcerative Colitis (UC) (16 women, 18 men, mean age 38.9 ± 14.9 years; 61.8% biologic-naïve). Regarding the primary endpoint, no difference was observed in the efficacy between biologic-naïve patients and patients with Adalimumab (ADA) originator replacement for non-medical reasons in terms of long-term persistence. However, ABP 501 showed a higher percentage of sustained clinical remission at 2 years in patients with CD (64 patients, 77%) than in those with UC (15 patients, 45.5%; p=0.00091). Nine patients (six with CD and three with UC) experienced adverse events that led to drug discontinuation in three. Conclusions: APB 501 showed a good safety and efficacy profile in maintaining clinical response at 2 years in patients with IBD, both as a treatment-naïve and as a replacement for ADA originator for non-medical reasons.

Adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 is equally effective and safe in long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases patients when used as first biologic treatment or as replace of the ADA originator for a non-medical reason

Lombardi, Gianmarco;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Objective: Biosimilars represent a new opportunity for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment and economic sustainability of therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of the adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 in biologic-naïve vs. biologic-switched IBD patients. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using a database of patients with IBD treated with ABP 501, biologic-naïve or switched from the original, at eight IBD centers. We included adult patients with at least one year of follow-up. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy (persistence) and safety (adverse event rate) of ABP 501 therapy. Results: A total of 118 patients with IBD were included in the analysis: 84 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) (39 women, 45 men, mean age 40.4 ± 14.3 years; 33% biologic-naïve) and 34 patients with ulcerative Colitis (UC) (16 women, 18 men, mean age 38.9 ± 14.9 years; 61.8% biologic-naïve). Regarding the primary endpoint, no difference was observed in the efficacy between biologic-naïve patients and patients with Adalimumab (ADA) originator replacement for non-medical reasons in terms of long-term persistence. However, ABP 501 showed a higher percentage of sustained clinical remission at 2 years in patients with CD (64 patients, 77%) than in those with UC (15 patients, 45.5%; p=0.00091). Nine patients (six with CD and three with UC) experienced adverse events that led to drug discontinuation in three. Conclusions: APB 501 showed a good safety and efficacy profile in maintaining clinical response at 2 years in patients with IBD, both as a treatment-naïve and as a replacement for ADA originator for non-medical reasons.
2023
adalimumab, ABP 501, biosimilar, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1144509
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact