Background: Empagliflozin can curb inflammation and oxidative stress, through sodium-proton exchanger (NHE) inhibition, in a model of lipotoxicity in human myeloid angiogenic cells (MAC), which mediate endothelial repairing processes. Aim of this study is to assess in human MAC whether: (1) Stearic acid (SA) induced inflammation and increase in oxidant stress is accompanied by bioenergetic alterations; (2) empagliflozin anti-lipotoxic action is concomitant with coherent changes in bioenergetic metabolism, possibly via NHE blockade. Methods: MAC were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy volunteers and incubated in the presence/absence of SA (100 μM for 3 h) with/without empagliflozin (EMPA 100 μM) or amiloride (Ami 100 μM) for 1 h. Cell respiration (oxygen consumption rate OCR) and anaerobic glycolysis (measured as proton production rate) were recorded in real-time by Seahorse technology, and ATP production (anaerobic glycolysis- and oxphos-derived) rates were calculated. Results: SA, at the concentration causing inflammation and increased oxidant stress, altered cell bioenergetics of human MAC, with overall reductions in basal OCR and oxphos-derived ATP production (all p < 0.05), pointing to mitochondrial alterations. EMPA, at the concentration counteracting SA-induced lipotoxicity, both alone and in the presence of SA, caused NHE-independent extensive bioenergetic alterations (from p < 0.05 to p < 0.01), greater than those induced by SA alone. Conclusions: In human MAC: (1) SA altered cell bioenergetics, concomitantly with inflammation and oxidant stress; (2) EMPA possibly inhibited mitochondrial respiration, (3) the protective effect of EMPA against SA-induced lipotoxicity was unlikely to be mediated through bioenergetic metabolism.

Empagliflozin does not reverse lipotoxicity-induced impairment in human myeloid angiogenic cell bioenergetics

Bonadonna R. C.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Background: Empagliflozin can curb inflammation and oxidative stress, through sodium-proton exchanger (NHE) inhibition, in a model of lipotoxicity in human myeloid angiogenic cells (MAC), which mediate endothelial repairing processes. Aim of this study is to assess in human MAC whether: (1) Stearic acid (SA) induced inflammation and increase in oxidant stress is accompanied by bioenergetic alterations; (2) empagliflozin anti-lipotoxic action is concomitant with coherent changes in bioenergetic metabolism, possibly via NHE blockade. Methods: MAC were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy volunteers and incubated in the presence/absence of SA (100 μM for 3 h) with/without empagliflozin (EMPA 100 μM) or amiloride (Ami 100 μM) for 1 h. Cell respiration (oxygen consumption rate OCR) and anaerobic glycolysis (measured as proton production rate) were recorded in real-time by Seahorse technology, and ATP production (anaerobic glycolysis- and oxphos-derived) rates were calculated. Results: SA, at the concentration causing inflammation and increased oxidant stress, altered cell bioenergetics of human MAC, with overall reductions in basal OCR and oxphos-derived ATP production (all p < 0.05), pointing to mitochondrial alterations. EMPA, at the concentration counteracting SA-induced lipotoxicity, both alone and in the presence of SA, caused NHE-independent extensive bioenergetic alterations (from p < 0.05 to p < 0.01), greater than those induced by SA alone. Conclusions: In human MAC: (1) SA altered cell bioenergetics, concomitantly with inflammation and oxidant stress; (2) EMPA possibly inhibited mitochondrial respiration, (3) the protective effect of EMPA against SA-induced lipotoxicity was unlikely to be mediated through bioenergetic metabolism.
2022
Cell metabolism
Empagliflozin
Myeloid angiogenic cells
Oxygen consumption
Stearic acid
Energy Metabolism
Humans
Sodium
Benzhydryl Compounds
Glucosides
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1144397
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact