New neovagina-creating technique on the basis of a fasciocutaneous flap for Müllerian agenesis

Background: Müllerian agenesis, known as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, is characterized by the absence of the uterus, cervix, and two thirds of the proximal vagina. To allow sexual intercourse, dilatator-based conservative approaches and Vecchietti vaginoplasty generate progressive traction on the vaginal stump until adequate vaginal size is achieved. Other approaches create the neovagina using mucous/cutaneous, peritoneal, or ileal/sigmoid grafts or cutaneous flaps from the genitalia to fulfill a newly developed space between the bladder and rectum. The drawback of the first approach is the long time required, whereas stenosis, dehiscence, poor esthetic results, or absence of vaginal sensitivity limit the latter. Objective: To present a new surgical technique on the basis of an internal thigh fasciocutaneous flap for generating a compliant and sensitive neovagina with preservation of the external genitalia. Design: Video demonstration of the surgical steps. Patient(s): An 18-year-old woman with Müllerian agenesis confirmed at ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. The residual vagina was 3 cm long and 1.5 cm wide. After counseling by a gynecologist and plastic surgeon, in which all available techniques with pros and cons were exposed, the patient opted for the new technique. The long time required by conservative approaches and the desire to preserve the external genitalia with the chance to have a sensitive vagina guided the choice. Intervention(s): The cul-de-sac of the vaginal stump was incised transversally. A 4-cm-wide and 9-cm-long canal bounded anteriorly by the bladder, posteriorly by the rectum, and superiorly by the peritoneum of Douglas was developed by blunt dissection. Fasciocutaneous flaps of 12 per 5 cm on the anteromedial aspect of the thighs were developed, identifying the vascular-from the pudendal artery-and nervous pedicles. A tunnel between the flap pedicles and neovagina introitus was created between fascia and subcutaneous tissue, detaching the vulvar structures from the ischiopubic ramus. Flaps were tunneled up to the neovagina introitus and sutured together by interrupted suture to form a tube with outside skin. The flaps were transposed into the canal everting the tube to obtain the skin lining the internal neovagina. The inferior margins of the flaps were sutured to the vaginal stump mucosa. No internal stitches were placed. Antibiotic prophylaxis was used during surgery. The entire procedure lasted 6 hours. During the postoperative period, no special positioning or ambulation restrictions were used. Main outcome measure(s): Compliance and sensitivity of the neovagina, esthetic result, and perioperative and long-term complications. Result(s): The postoperative course was uneventful, with early mobilization. The length of hospital stay was 16 days to allow proper vaginal dilator use; initial daily followed by intermittent use was planned. At a 2-year follow-up, the neovagina was sensitive and patent, allowing sexual intercourse. No complications were reported, and the patient was satisfied with the functional and esthetic result. Conclusion(s): The new surgical technique was feasible and effective, preserving the external genitalia and avoiding graft healing and bowel secretion drawbacks without an intra-abdominal surgical step and related risks. However, more cases-2 cases performed to date with similar results-and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the efficacy. In this regard, the regular use of vaginal dilators and forecast adherence between flaps and the connective tissue of the bladder and rectum are expected to prevent neovagina prolapse without any anchoring to the pelvic structures.