After an introduction concerning the recent interest in the perduellio trials and the so-called duumviral judgments, the essay focuses on the 'mythical' trial against the surviving Horatius and the 'historical' trial against Rabirius, in an attempt to bring out the annalistic traditions relating to the former and, with regard to the latter, to specify the institutional, ideological and political background of Labienus' accusation, as well as the role played by Caesar.
Dalla pro Rabirio perduellionis reo alla causa Horatiana: attestazioni storiche e storiografiche del giudizio duumvirale
pelloso
2021-01-01
Abstract
After an introduction concerning the recent interest in the perduellio trials and the so-called duumviral judgments, the essay focuses on the 'mythical' trial against the surviving Horatius and the 'historical' trial against Rabirius, in an attempt to bring out the annalistic traditions relating to the former and, with regard to the latter, to specify the institutional, ideological and political background of Labienus' accusation, as well as the role played by Caesar.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pelloso-Riflessioni-su-attestazioni-giudizio-duumvirale.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione dell'editore
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
1.81 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.81 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
