Background: Psychiatric re-hospitalisation is considered costly and disruptive to individuals. The perspective of the mental health service user is largely unexplored in literature.The purpose of our study was to explore service users' experiences of psychiatric re-hospitalisation across six countries in Europe.Method: Eight focus groups were conducted in Romania, Slovenia, Finland, Italy, Austria and Norway.Results: A total of 55 service users participated in the study. All participants had been in receipt of mental health services for at least 1 year, and had experienced more than one psychiatric hospitalisation. The experience of re-hospitalisation was considered: (1) less traumatising than the first hospitalisation, (2) to be necessary, and a relief, (3) occurring by default and without progress, (4) part of the recovery process.Conclusions: Psychiatric re-hospitalisation was considered inevitable by the study participants, in both positive and negative terms. Striking similarities in service user experiences were found across all of the six countries, the first experience of psychiatric hospitalisation emerging as especially significant. Findings indicate the need for further action in order to develop more recovery and person-centred approaches within hospital care. For psychiatric inpatient care to be a positive part of the recovery process, further knowledge on what therapeutic action during the hospital stay would be beneficial, such as therapy, activities and integration with other services.

Mental health service users' experiences of psychiatric re-hospitalisation - an explorative focus group study in six European countries

Rabbi, L;Donisi, V
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: Psychiatric re-hospitalisation is considered costly and disruptive to individuals. The perspective of the mental health service user is largely unexplored in literature.The purpose of our study was to explore service users' experiences of psychiatric re-hospitalisation across six countries in Europe.Method: Eight focus groups were conducted in Romania, Slovenia, Finland, Italy, Austria and Norway.Results: A total of 55 service users participated in the study. All participants had been in receipt of mental health services for at least 1 year, and had experienced more than one psychiatric hospitalisation. The experience of re-hospitalisation was considered: (1) less traumatising than the first hospitalisation, (2) to be necessary, and a relief, (3) occurring by default and without progress, (4) part of the recovery process.Conclusions: Psychiatric re-hospitalisation was considered inevitable by the study participants, in both positive and negative terms. Striking similarities in service user experiences were found across all of the six countries, the first experience of psychiatric hospitalisation emerging as especially significant. Findings indicate the need for further action in order to develop more recovery and person-centred approaches within hospital care. For psychiatric inpatient care to be a positive part of the recovery process, further knowledge on what therapeutic action during the hospital stay would be beneficial, such as therapy, activities and integration with other services.
2018
Duhigg
Exploratory Focus Group Study
Mental Health Service Users
Service User Experience
Psychiatric Hospital Care
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s12913-018-3317-1.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 590.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
590.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1118349
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact