Background: Predicting Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) risk can be determinant in reducing its incidence and managing patients appropriately, however studies conducted thus far have identified single-risk factors with standard statistical approaches and limited accuracy.Aim: To build and evaluate performances of machine learning (ML) models to predict PEP probability and identify relevant features. Methods: A proof-of-concept study was performed on ML application on an international, multicenter, prospective cohort of ERCP patients. Data were split in training and test set, models used were gradient boosting (GB) and logistic regression (LR). A 10-split random cross-validation (CV) was applied on the training set to optimize parameters to obtain the best mean Area Under Curve (AUC). The model was re-trained on the whole training set with the best parameters and applied on test set. Shapley-Additive-exPlanation (SHAP) approach was applied to break down the model and clarify features impact.Results: One thousand one hundred and fifty patients were included, 6.1% developed PEP. GB model out-performed LR with AUC in CV of 0.7 vs 0.585 (p-value = 0.012). GB AUC in test was 0.671. Most relevant features for PEP prediction were: bilirubin, age, body mass index, procedure time, previous sphinctero-tomy, alcohol units/day, cannulation attempts, gender, gallstones, use of Ringer's solution and periproce-dural NSAIDs.Conclusion: In PEP prediction, GB significantly outperformed LR model and identified new clinical fea-tures relevant for the risk, most being pre-procedural.(c) 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Machine learning for the prediction of post-ERCP pancreatitis risk: A proof-of-concept study

De Pretis, Nicolò;Gabbrielli, Armando;Brozzi, Lorenzo;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Background: Predicting Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) risk can be determinant in reducing its incidence and managing patients appropriately, however studies conducted thus far have identified single-risk factors with standard statistical approaches and limited accuracy.Aim: To build and evaluate performances of machine learning (ML) models to predict PEP probability and identify relevant features. Methods: A proof-of-concept study was performed on ML application on an international, multicenter, prospective cohort of ERCP patients. Data were split in training and test set, models used were gradient boosting (GB) and logistic regression (LR). A 10-split random cross-validation (CV) was applied on the training set to optimize parameters to obtain the best mean Area Under Curve (AUC). The model was re-trained on the whole training set with the best parameters and applied on test set. Shapley-Additive-exPlanation (SHAP) approach was applied to break down the model and clarify features impact.Results: One thousand one hundred and fifty patients were included, 6.1% developed PEP. GB model out-performed LR with AUC in CV of 0.7 vs 0.585 (p-value = 0.012). GB AUC in test was 0.671. Most relevant features for PEP prediction were: bilirubin, age, body mass index, procedure time, previous sphinctero-tomy, alcohol units/day, cannulation attempts, gender, gallstones, use of Ringer's solution and periproce-dural NSAIDs.Conclusion: In PEP prediction, GB significantly outperformed LR model and identified new clinical fea-tures relevant for the risk, most being pre-procedural.(c) 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2023
Artificial intelligence
ERCP
Machine learning
Pancreatitis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1093589
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact