The essay deals with the classical thought of Ulpianus and Modestinus concerning the criteria to establish contractual liability; more precisely, it focusses on the late re-elaboration hinging on the broad and multifaceted figure of culpa. It also retraces the historical development that practice and theory, starting from the 3rd century AD, underwent both horizontally and vertically: from custodia to culpa in custodiendo, from dolus to culpa lata, from diligentia quam in suis as an exemption of malicious liability to the basis of fault-based liability

RIFLESSIONI SUI CRITERI SOGGETTIVI DI IMPUTAZIONE DELL’INADEMPIMENTO CONTRATTUALE A PARTIRE DALLA LATITUDO POST-CLASSICA DELLA CULPA

Carlo Pelloso
2020

Abstract

The essay deals with the classical thought of Ulpianus and Modestinus concerning the criteria to establish contractual liability; more precisely, it focusses on the late re-elaboration hinging on the broad and multifaceted figure of culpa. It also retraces the historical development that practice and theory, starting from the 3rd century AD, underwent both horizontally and vertically: from custodia to culpa in custodiendo, from dolus to culpa lata, from diligentia quam in suis as an exemption of malicious liability to the basis of fault-based liability
culpa - dolus - contractum - utilitas
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
C.PELLOSO_RIFLESSIONI SUI CRITERI SOGGETTIVI DI IMPUTAZIONE.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso ristretto
Dimensione 386.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
386.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11562/1051677
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact